Abstract:Objective: In the present report, we have described the outcomes of endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair for type B dissection involving the aortic arch (B1-2, D). Methods: Cases of endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair performed between January 2015 and December 2019 for aortic dissection designated as B1-2, D by the Society for Vascular Surgery/Society of Thoracic Surgeons classification were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at follow-up. The secondary end points included early mortality, early morbidities, and aortic-related late events. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to analyze survival from all-cause mortality and freedom from aortic-related late events in the endovascular, hybrid, and open groups. Propensity score matching and stratification (stratified by proximal dissection extension: B1, D and B2, D) were performed as sensitivity analyses to compare the outcomes among the three treatment patterns after controlling for major confounders. Results: The present study included 151 patients (men, 79.5%; mean age, 47.3 ± 10.5 years), with 72 (47.7%) in the endovascular group, 46 (30.5%) in the hybrid group, and 33 (21.8%) in the open group. No significant difference was noted in early mortality between the endovascular, hybrid, and open groups (1.4% vs 2.2% vs 3.0%; P = .791). The incidence of early endoleak was significantly greater (33.3% vs 13.0% vs 6.1%; P = .002) and the incidence of renal function deterioration was less (4.2% vs 26.1% vs 24.2%; P = .001) after endovascular repair vs hybrid arch repair and open surgery. After a median follow-up of 40.0 months (range, 0-84.0 months), no significant differences were found in all-cause mortality (5.6% vs 4.3% vs 3.0%; P = 1.0), aortic-related late events (16.7% vs 15.2% vs 12.1%; P = .834), or late endoleak (9.7% vs 4.3% vs 6.1%; P = .630) after endovascular, hybrid, and open surgery. The propensity score matching and stratification analyses displayed consistent outcomes for early mortality, all-cause mortality, and aortic-related late events among the three groups. Conclusions: The mid- to long-term outcomes after endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair for type B dissection involving the aortic arch (B1-2, D) were favorable and comparable in selected patients. Extensive experience and multidisciplinary teamwork are prerequisites for individualized strategies for repair of B1-2, D.

Crystalloid Versus Blood Cardioplegia For Surgical Repair Of Type A Aortic Dissection: Early And Long-Term Outcomes

The frozen elephant trunk technique in acute aortic dissection: the ultimate solution? An institutional experience

Short and midterm outcomes of surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection concomitant CABG vs. ECMO support: A retrospective study

Preoperative pericardial hematoma in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD): Do we need an adjusted treatment?

Surgical treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of type B aortic dissection involving the aortic arch

Femoral arterial cannulation for surgical repair of stanford type A aortic dissection

Aortic versus axillary cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection repair: A meta-analysis

Impact of fluid balance and blood transfusion during extracorporeal circulation on outcome for acute type A aortic dissection surgery

Two surgical strategies (early carotid reperfusion vs. Central aortic repair-first) of acute type a aortic dissection complicated with cerebral malperfusion syndrome: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Warm Blood Cardioplegia Versus Cold Crystalloid Cardioplegia In Patients Affected By Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction In The Early Post-Operative Phase: Comparative Results Of Crystalloid And Blood-Based Cardioplegia Solutions

Which cannulation (axillary cannulation or femoral cannulation) is better for acute type A aortic dissection repair? A meta-analysis of nine clinical studies.

Perioperative hemostatic management of patients with type A aortic dissection

Extracorporeal life support after surgical repair for acute type a aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Does arterial cannulation site for aortic dissection repair impact surgical outcomes?

Hemostatic Properties of Aortic Root Preservation versus Root Replacement for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Pooled Analysis

Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Acute Type-A Aortic Dissection with Coronary Artery Involvement.

Choosing the correct treatment for acute aortic type B dissection

Acute type A aortic dissection – a review

Systematic Innominate Artery Cannulation Strategy in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Better Perfusion, Better Results

Is There A Role For Hemoadsorption During Cardiopulmonary Bypass And Circulatory Arrest In Acute Aortic Dissection Surgery?