Impact of Tumor Size on the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study
Yutaro Kato,Atsushi Sugioka,Masayuki Kojima,Nicholas L. Syn,Wang Zhongkai,Rong Liu,Federica Cipriani,Thomas Armstrong,Davit L. Aghayan,Tiing-Foong Siow,Chetana Lim,Olivier Scatton,Paulo Herman,Fabricio Ferreira Coelho,Marco V. Marino,Vincenzo Mazzaferro,Adrian K. H. Chiow,Iswanto Sucandy,Arpad Ivanecz,Sung Hoon Choi,Jae Hoon Lee,Mikel Gastaca,Marco Vivarelli,Felice Giuliante,Bernardo Dalla Valle,Andrea Ruzzenente,Chee-Chien Yong,Constantino Fondevila,Mikhail Efanov,Fabrizio Di Benedetto,Andrea Belli,James O. Park,Fernando Rotellar,Gi-Hong Choi,Ricardo Robles-Campos,Xiaoying Wang,Robert P. Sutcliffe,Moritz Schmelzle,Johann Pratschke,Eric C. H. Lai,Charing C. N. Chong,Mathieu D’Hondt,Kazuteru Monden,Santiago Lopez-Ben,T. Peter Kingham,Fabio Forchino,Alessandro Ferrero,Giuseppe Maria Ettorre,Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri,Franco Pascual,Daniel Cherqui,Olivier Soubrane,Go Wakabayashi,Roberto I. Troisi,Tan-To Cheung,Zewei Chen,Mengqiu Yin,Mizelle D’Silva,Ho-Seong Han,Phan Phuoc Nghia,Tran Cong duy Long,Bjørn Edwin,David Fuks,Kuo-Hsin Chen,Mohammad Abu Hilal,Luca Aldrighetti,Brian K. P. Goh,Mikel Prieto,Celine De Meyere,Juul Meurs,Kit-Fai Lee,Diana Salimgereeva,Ruslan Alikhanov,Lip-Seng Lee,Jae Young Jang,Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger,Victor Lopez-Lopez,Margarida Casellas I Robert,Roberto Montalti,Boram Lee,Hao-Ping Wang,Mansour Saleh,Simone Vani,Francesco Ardito,Ugo Giustizieri,Davide Citterio,Federico Mocchegiani,Marco Colasanti,Yoelimar Guzmán,Kevin P. Labadie,Paolo Magistri,Kohei Mishima,Felix Krenzien,Prashant Kadam,Chung Ngai Tang,Jacob Ghotbi,Åsmund Avdem Fretland,Mariano Giglio,Alessandro Mazzotta,Qu Liu,Shian Yu,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13863-z
IF: 4.339
2023-07-28
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Abstract:IntroductionAlthough tumor size (TS) is known to affect surgical outcomes in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), its impact on laparoscopic major hepatectomy (L-MH) is not well studied. The objectives of this study were to investigate the impact of TS on the perioperative outcomes of L-MH and to elucidate the optimal TS cutoff for stratifying the difficulty of L-MH.MethodsThis was a post-hoc analysis of 3008 patients who underwent L-MH at 48 international centers. A total 1396 patients met study criteria and were included. The impact of TS cutoffs was investigated by stratifying TS at each 10-mm interval. The optimal cutoffs were determined taking into consideration the number of endpoints which showed a statistically significant split around the cut-points of interest and the magnitude of relative risk after correction for multiple risk factors.ResultsWe identified 2 optimal TS cutoffs, 50 mm and 100 mm, which segregated L-MH into 3 groups. An increasing TS across these 3 groups (≤ 50 mm, 51–100 mm, > 100 mm), was significantly associated with a higher open conversion rate (11.2%, 14.7%, 23.0%, P < 0.001), longer operating time (median, 340 min, 346 min, 365 min, P = 0.025), increased blood loss (median, 300 ml, ml, 400 ml, P = 0.002) and higher rate of intraoperative blood transfusion (13.1%, 15.9%, 27.6%, P < 0.001). Postoperative outcomes such as overall morbidity, major morbidity, and length of stay were comparable across the three groups.ConclusionIncreasing TS was associated with poorer intraoperative but not postoperative outcomes after L-MH. We determined 2 TS cutoffs (50 mm and 10 mm) which could optimally stratify the surgical difficulty of L-MH.
oncology,surgery