Abstract:Introduction Worldwide, over 850 million people need renal replacement therapy, and over 80% of them are on hemodialysis. The term "dialysis adequacy" is most often associated with the achievement of minimally acceptable indices - single pool Kt/V (spKt/V) and urea reduction ratio (URR%) and largely does not take into account other clinical indicators in patients. In addition, it should be taken into account that in the conditions of clinical practice, their measurement is carried out according to standards controlled by the regulatory structures and is carried out with a frequency between one and three months, and not during each dialysis procedure. Accordingly, based on the obtained value, we assume that it refers to the urea clearance of the entire dialysis prescription. A new methodology for measuring dialysis adequacy through ionic dialysis allows dose estimation in real time without the need for additional blood tests by recording the difference in sodium ion conductivity at the dialyzer inlet and outlet. The latter corresponds to the dialysis dose delivered and can be measured at each dialysis session, enabling timely therapeutic intervention at minimal cost to the community. The aim of this original article is to present ion dialysis to the community as a reliable and inexpensive alternative to classical urea kinetic modeling (UKM), evaluating the comparability of the two methods and the possible sources of error in the result. Material and methods This was a retrospective study of 32 patients undergoing hemodialysis at the Clinic of Nephrology and Dialysis at the University Hospital St. Marina (Varna, Bulgaria) for the period between January and December 2020. For each of the patients, four measurements (every three months) of the delivered dialysis dose were performed by ion dialysis and classical urea kinetic modeling in order to assess the comparability and reliability of the two methods. Results The analysis of the results proved a high correlation between the validated indicators of dialysis adequacy (spKt/V; URR) and those registered with online monitoring (online clearance monitor) by ionic dialysis - online Kt/V (onKt/V) while at the same time reporting a significant difference in the two methods - primarily based on the anthropometric formulas used to estimate the volume. The established regression models confirmed the high predictive value of ionic dialysis in relation to the actually delivered dose. Discussion Despite the high bond strength, our recorded values for onKt/V are 8% lower compared to results using UKM. Therefore, onKt/V as an assessment metric has the ability to underestimate the dialysis dose received. Various factors as a possible source of error and its cause have been reported by some authors. Several studies have reported differences of 2-5% in instantaneous conductance measurements, which they associate mainly with differences in the diffusion coefficients of urea and sodium, as well as different effects of dialysis membrane charge or inadequate ultrafiltration correction. Conclusions Our study confirms that online clearance monitoring (OCM) is a practical non-invasive tool for daily use that complements the classic performance of OCM by helping to deliver an adequate dialysis dose with increased patient benefit and minimal cost of financial resources.

Evaluating hydrogen ion mobilization during hemodialysis using only predialysis and postdialysis blood bicarbonate concentrations

Mathematical modelling of bicarbonate supplementation and acid-base chemistry in kidney failure patients on hemodialysis

Effect of time-dependent dialysate bicarbonate concentrations on acid–base and uremic solute kinetics during hemodialysis treatments

Quantification of dissolved H2 and continuous monitoring of hydrogen-rich water for haemodialysis applications: An experimental study

Same therapy, same calcium mobilization? Exploring calcium exchange across body compartments using a patient‐specific predictive model

Real-Time Dialysis Dose: Ionic Dialysis Versus Classical Urea Kinetic Modeling Indices

The effect of changes in intra-compartmental bioimpedance measurements with early intra-dialytic hypotension during haemodialysis

Comparison of Bioimpedance Methods for Estimating Total Body Water and Intracellular Water Changes During Hemodialysis

Revisiting the concept of constant tissue conductivities for volume estimation in dialysis patients using bioimpedance spectroscopy

Extracellular and intracellular fluid volume monitoring during dialysis by multifrequency impedancemetry

Phosphate Removal Model: An Observational Study Of Low-Flux Dialyzers In Conventional Hemodialysis Therapy

Magnitude and precision of absolute blood volume estimated during hemodialysis

Potassium kinetics during hemodialysis

Modification And Validation Of The Phosphate Removal Model: A Multicenter Study

Hemodynamic effects of low versus high dialysate bicarbonate concentration in hemodialysis patients

Hemodialysis Efficiency Predictor in End-Stage Kidney Disease Using Real-Time Heart Rate Variability

Effect of Correction of Metabolic Acidosis on Serum Interleukin 10 Levels in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

The Donnan equilibrium is still valid in high-volume HDF

Interaction between intradialytic exercise and hemodialysis adequacy

Zero Diffusive Sodium Balance in Hemodialysis Provided by an Algorithm‐Based Electrolyte Balancing Controller: A Proof of Principle Clinical Study

Comment on “Estimating serum‐ionized magnesium concentration in hemodialysis patients”