Abstract:Abstract To analyse climate change mitigation strategies, economists rely on simplified climate models—so-called climate emulators—that provide a realistic quantitative link between CO2 emissions and global warming at low computational costs. In this paper, we propose a generic and transparent calibration and evaluation strategy for these climate emulators that are based on freely and easily accessible state-of-the-art benchmark data from climate sciences. We demonstrate that the appropriate choice of the free model parameters can be of key relevance for the predicted social cost of carbon. The key idea we put forward is to calibrate the simplified climate models to benchmark data from comprehensive global climate models that took part in the coupled model intercomparison project, phase 5 (CMIP5). In particular, we propose to use four different test cases that are considered pivotal in the climate science literature: two highly idealized tests to separately calibrate and evaluate the carbon cycle and temperature response, an idealized test to quantify the transient climate response, and a final test to evaluate the performance for scenarios close to those arising from economic models, and that include exogenous forcing. As a concrete example, we re-calibrate the climate part of the widely used DICE-2016, fathoming the CMIP5 uncertainty range of model responses: the multi-model mean as well as extreme, but still permissible climate sensitivities and carbon cycle responses. We demonstrate that the functional form of the climate emulator of the DICE-2016 model is fit for purpose, despite its simplicity, but its carbon cycle and temperature equations are miscalibrated, leading to the conclusion that one may want to be skeptical about predictions derived from DICE-2016. We examine the importance of the calibration for the social cost of carbon in the context of a partial equilibrium setting where interest rates are exogenous, as well as the simple general equilibrium setting from DICE-2016. We find that the model uncertainty from different consistent calibrations of the climate system can change the social cost of carbon by a factor of 4 if one assumes a quadratic damage function. When calibrated to the multi-model mean, our model predicts similar values for the social cost of carbon as the original DICE-2016, but with a strongly reduced sensitivity to the discount rate and about 1 degree less long-term warming. The social cost of carbon in DICE-2016 is oversensitive to the discount rate, leading to extreme comparative statics responses to changes in preferences.

Teaching the crisis: Climate change policy and cost curve confusion

Complexity, economic science and possible economic benefits of climate change mitigation policy

A Simple Climate-Solow Model for Introducing the Economics of Climate Change to Undergraduate Students

Comparing the Effects of Traditional vs. Misconceptions-Based Instruction on Student Understanding of the Greenhouse Effect

Discounting the Future: On Climate Change, Ambiguity Aversion and Epstein–Zin Preferences

The Climate in Climate Economics

Declining CO2 price paths

Six minutes to promote change: People, not facts, alter students' perceptions on climate change

Annals of Education: Teaching Climate Change and Global Public Health

Climate change, tipping points, and economics

The Cost of Climate Action: Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Climate Information on Charitable Donations to Climate Activism

Implementation of a climate decision support system in an undergraduate weather and climate classroom

Counter-intuitive behaviour of energy system models under CO2 caps and prices

Simple Rules for Climate Policy and Integrated Assessment

Changing teaching techniques and adapting new technologies to improve student learning in an introductory meteorology and climate course

What Does it Take to Control Global Temperatures? A toolbox for testing and estimating the impact of economic policies on climate

The Social Cost of Carbon with Economic and Climate Risks

The Climate Cost of Climate Investment: A Two-Period Perspective

The Economics of Climate Adaptation: An Assessment

Climate change belief, sustainability education, and political values: Assessing the need for higher-education curriculum reform

Optimal Climate Policy As If the Transition Matters