Abstract:While homophily -- the tendency to link with similar others -- may nurture a sense of belonging and shared values, it can also hinder diversity and widen inequalities. Here, we unravel this trade-off analytically, revealing homophily traps for minority groups: scenarios where increased homophilic interaction among minorities negatively affects their structural opportunities within a network. We demonstrate that homophily traps arise when minority size falls below 25% of a network, at which point homophily comes at the expense of lower structural visibility for the minority group. Our work reveals that social groups require a critical size to benefit from homophily without incurring structural costs, providing insights into core processes underlying the emergence of group inequality in networks.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to explore the influence of homophily in networks. In particular, when members of minority groups tend to establish connections with similar groups, how does this behavior affect their structural opportunities in the network? Specifically, the paper reveals the phenomenon of the "homophily trap": when the size of a minority group is less than 25% of the total network size, increased homophilic interactions will reduce its structural visibility, thus having an adverse impact on the minority group. #### Main problems: 1. **The double - edged - sword effect of homophily**: - Homophily can enhance the sense of belonging and shared values within a group, but it may also lead to a decrease in diversity and an increase in inequality. - Especially in networks containing minority groups, homophily may limit the minority groups' access to external opportunities, thus exacerbating inequality. 2. **The homophily trap**: - When the size of a minority group is less than 25% of the network, higher homophily will lead to a reduction in the structural opportunities of the minority group. - This phenomenon is called the "homophily trap", that is, while the minority group pursues internal cohesion, it loses the opportunity for broader network connections. 3. **The critical group size**: - Through analysis, the paper finds that a minority group needs to reach a certain critical size (about 25%) in order to benefit from homophily without incurring structural costs. - Minority groups smaller than this critical size cannot make up for the lost external connections through internal connections, resulting in a structural disadvantage. #### Formula analysis: - **Average degree formula**: \[ \langle k_i \rangle=\frac{2E_{ii}+E_{ij}+E_{ji}}{n_i} \] where \(E_{ii}\) represents the number of within - group edges, \(E_{ij}\) and \(E_{ji}\) represent the number of between - group edges, and \(n_i\) represents the size of the group. - **Structural gap formula**: \[ \Delta k=\langle k_0 \rangle-\langle k_1 \rangle \] where \(\langle k_0 \rangle\) and \(\langle k_1 \rangle\) represent the average degrees of the minority group and the majority group respectively. - **Derivative formula**: \[ \frac{\partial\Delta k}{\partial h_{00}} = 2Nf_0 - N - 2 \] This formula describes the influence of the minority group homophily \(h_{00}\) on the structural gap \(\Delta k\). - **Critical minority group size**: \[ f_0^*=\frac{2 + N}{4N} \] When the network size \(N\) tends to infinity, the critical minority group size approaches 25%: \[ \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}\frac{2 + N}{4N}=\frac{1}{4}=0.25 \] In conclusion, this paper reveals the influence of homophily on minority groups in networks through mathematical models and empirical research, and proposes the concept of the "homophily trap", providing a new perspective for understanding group inequality problems in social networks.

Stronger together? The homophily trap in networks

Visibility of minorities in social networks

Homophily and minority size explain perception biases in social networks

Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks

Opportunity and choice in social networks

Homophily Within and Across Groups

Structural Diversity and Homophily: A Study Across More than One Hundred Big Networks

Chasm in Hegemony: Explaining and Reproducing Disparities in Homophilous Networks

Unveiling homophily beyond the pool of opportunities

Strength of minority ties: the role of homophily and group composition in a weighted social network

Minorities in networks and algorithms

Social Learning, the Countervailing Effects of Homophily, and Assortativity Patterns in Networks

Variety Is the Spice of Life: Diverse Social Networks Are Associated With Social Cohesion and Well-Being

The Homophily Principle in Social Network Analysis

Link recommendations: Their impact on network structure and minorities

How networks shape diversity for better or worse

Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks

How does homophily shape the topology of a dynamic network?

The Paradox of Second-Order Homophily in Networks

Homophily as a Process Generating Social Networks: Insights from Social Distance Attachment Model