Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks

Aili Asikainen,Gerardo Iñiguez,Kimmo Kaski,Mikko Kivelä

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax7310

2018-09-17

Abstract:Much of the structure in social networks has been explained by two seemingly independent network evolution mechanisms: triadic closure and homophily. While it is common to consider these mechanisms separately or in the frame of a static model, empirical studies suggest that their dynamic interplay is the very process responsible for the homophilous patterns of association seen in off- and online social networks. By combining these two mechanisms in a minimal solvable dynamic model, we confirm theoretically the long-held and empirically established hypothesis that homophily can be amplified by the triadic closure mechanism. This research approach allows us to estimate how much of the observed homophily in various friendship and communication networks is due to amplification for a given amount of triadic closure. We find that the cumulative advantage-like process leading to homophily amplification can, under certain circumstances, also lead to the widely documented core-periphery structure of social networks, as well as to the emergence of memory of previous homophilic constraints (equivalent to hysteresis phenomena in physics). The theoretical understanding provided by our results highlights the importance of early intervention in managing at the societal level the most adverse effects of homophilic decision-making, such as inequality, segregation and online echo chambers.

Physics and Society,Social and Information Networks

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the mechanism of homophily pattern formation in social networks. Specifically, the author focuses on how two key network evolution mechanisms - triadic closure and homophily - interact to lead to the observed enhancement of homophily. By combining these two mechanisms to construct a minimal dynamic model, the author aims to theoretically confirm the long - standing hypothesis that the triadic closure mechanism can amplify homophily. In addition, this study also explores how this dynamic process affects the core - periphery structure of social networks and the homophily hysteresis phenomenon, and discusses the implications of these findings for social intervention strategies, especially how to reduce the negative effects brought by homophily - based decisions, such as inequality, segregation and the online echo - chamber effect, through early intervention.

The key contribution of the paper lies in providing a theoretical framework through which it can be estimated how much of the observed homophily in different friendship and communication networks is due to the amplification effect of triadic closure. This not only helps to gain a deeper understanding of homophily patterns in social networks, but also provides a scientific basis for formulating effective policies to reduce social segregation.