Abstract:In the rapidly evolving field of Large Language Models (LLMs), there is a critical need to thoroughly analyze their capabilities and risks. Central to our investigation are two novel elements. Firstly, it is the innovative parallels between the statistical patterns of word relationships within LLMs and Martin Heidegger's concepts of "ready-to-hand" and "present-at-hand," which encapsulate the utilitarian and scientific altitudes humans employ in interacting with the world. This comparison lays the groundwork for positioning LLMs as the digital counterpart to the Faculty of Verbal Knowledge, shedding light on their capacity to emulate certain facets of human reasoning. Secondly, a structural analysis of human reasoning, viewed through Heidegger's notion of truth as "unconcealment" is conducted This foundational principle enables us to map out the inputs and outputs of the reasoning system and divide reasoning into four distinct categories. Respective cognitive faculties are delineated, allowing us to place LLMs within the broader schema of human reasoning, thus clarifying their strengths and inherent limitations. Our findings reveal that while LLMs possess the capability for Direct Explicative Reasoning and Pseudo Rational Reasoning, they fall short in authentic rational reasoning and have no creative reasoning capabilities, due to the current lack of many analogous AI models such as the Faculty of Judgement. The potential and risks of LLMs when they are augmented with other AI technologies are also evaluated. The results indicate that although LLMs have achieved proficiency in some reasoning abilities, the aspiration to match or exceed human intellectual capabilities is yet unattained. This research not only enriches our comprehension of LLMs but also propels forward the discourse on AI's potential and its bounds, paving the way for future explorations into AI's evolving landscape.

Humanlike Cognitive Patterns as Emergent Phenomena in Large Language Models

Thinking Fast and Slow in Large Language Models

Language models and psychological sciences

Large Language Models and Cognitive Science: A Comprehensive Review of Similarities, Differences, and Challenges

Large Language Models show both individual and collective creativity comparable to humans

Divergent Creativity in Humans and Large Language Models

Large language models as linguistic simulators and cognitive models in human research

Predicting and Understanding Human Action Decisions: Insights from Large Language Models and Cognitive Instance-Based Learning

Should We Fear Large Language Models? A Structural Analysis of the Human Reasoning System for Elucidating LLM Capabilities and Risks Through the Lens of Heidegger's Philosophy

Large Language Models Assume People are More Rational than We Really are

The Emergence of Strategic Reasoning of Large Language Models

A Perspective on Large Language Models, Intelligent Machines, and Knowledge Acquisition

Do large language models show decision heuristics similar to humans? A case study using GPT-3.5.

Using large language models in psychology

LLM Cognitive Judgements Differ From Human

Exploring the Frontiers of LLMs in Psychological Applications: A Comprehensive Review

Dissociating language and thought in large language models: a cognitive perspective

Large Language Models Are Not Strong Abstract Reasoners

Artificial Neuropsychology: Are Large Language Models Developing Executive Functions?

Large Language Models and the Reverse Turing Test