A Perspective on Large Language Models, Intelligent Machines, and Knowledge Acquisition

Vladimir Cherkassky,Eng Hock Lee
2024-08-13
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are known for their remarkable ability to generate synthesized 'knowledge', such as text documents, music, images, etc. However, there is a huge gap between LLM's and human capabilities for understanding abstract concepts and reasoning. We discuss these issues in a larger philosophical context of human knowledge acquisition and the Turing test. In addition, we illustrate the limitations of LLMs by analyzing GPT-4 responses to questions ranging from science and math to common sense reasoning. These examples show that GPT-4 can often imitate human reasoning, even though it lacks understanding. However, LLM responses are synthesized from a large LLM model trained on all available data. In contrast, human understanding is based on a small number of abstract concepts. Based on this distinction, we discuss the impact of LLMs on acquisition of human knowledge and education.
Computation and Language,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs) and discusses them within the philosophical context of human knowledge acquisition and intelligent understanding. The author analyzes the performance of LLMs like GPT-4 in handling issues ranging from science and mathematics to common-sense reasoning, and points out that although these models can generate seemingly intelligent responses, they lack an understanding of abstract concepts and true reasoning abilities. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following core issues: 1. **Capabilities and Limitations of LLMs**: By analyzing the performance of LLMs like GPT-4 in different fields, it reveals their limitations in understanding and reasoning. 2. **Definition and Evaluation of Intelligence**: Discusses the differences between LLMs and human intelligence and raises issues with evaluation methods based on the Turing test. 3. **Types of Knowledge**: Distinguishes between observer-independent knowledge and observer-related knowledge, and explores the different performances of LLMs in these two types of knowledge. 4. **Impact on Education**: Discusses the potential impact of LLMs on the education system, particularly how students might use these tools to bypass certain important aspects of the traditional learning process. 5. **Challenges in Scientific Understanding**: Raises the issue of the lack of scientific explanation in the current development of AI technology and the potential problems of a development model based on beliefs rather than scientific evidence. In summary, the paper aims to deeply explore the capability boundaries of large language models, particularly their true level of understanding and reasoning, and on this basis, reflect on the impact of these technologies on future education and society.