Generative AI regulation can learn from social media regulation

Ruth Elisabeth Appel

2024-12-16

Abstract:There is strong agreement that generative AI should be regulated, but strong disagreement on how to approach regulation. While some argue that AI regulation should mostly rely on extensions of existing laws, others argue that entirely new laws and regulations are needed to ensure that generative AI benefits society. In this paper, I argue that the debates on generative AI regulation can be informed by the debates and evidence on social media regulation. For example, AI companies have faced allegations of political bias regarding the images and text their models produce, similar to the allegations social media companies have faced regarding content ranking on their platforms. First, I compare and contrast the affordances of generative AI and social media to highlight their similarities and differences. Then, I discuss specific policy recommendations based on the evolution of social media and their regulation. These recommendations include investments in: efforts to counter bias and perceptions thereof (e.g., via transparency, researcher access, oversight boards, democratic input, research studies), specific areas of regulatory concern (e.g., youth wellbeing, election integrity) and trust and safety, computational social science research, and a more global perspective. Applying lessons learnt from social media regulation to generative AI regulation can save effort and time, and prevent avoidable mistakes.

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to effectively regulate generative AI by drawing on the regulatory experience of social media. Specifically, the author believes that although there is a broad consensus on whether generative AI should be regulated, there are still significant differences regarding how to carry out such regulation. Some people advocate mainly relying on the extension of existing laws, while others think that entirely new laws and regulations are required. The author proposes that by analyzing the evolution of social media regulation, valuable insights can be provided for the regulation of generative AI, thus saving time and avoiding unnecessary mistakes.

### Summary of the Core Issues in the Paper

1. **Regulatory Requirements for Generative AI**:
- All sectors of society generally agree that generative AI needs to be regulated, but there are differences regarding the specific regulatory methods.
- Some viewpoints believe that it can be achieved by expanding existing laws and regulations, while other viewpoints emphasize the need to formulate brand - new laws and regulations.

2. **Drawing on the Experience of Social Media Regulation**:
- The author believes that generative AI and social media have similarities in content review, algorithm transparency, etc., so lessons can be learned from the regulation of social media.
- Specifically, the author puts forward the following policy suggestions:
- **Reducing Bias and Its Perception**: Through means such as transparency, supervisory committees, researcher access rights, and democratic participation.
- **Addressing Specific Regulatory Concerns**: Such as the well - being of adolescents, election integrity, and investing in trust and safety.
- **Promoting Research in Computational Social Science**: Evaluating and improving these systems through multidisciplinary research.
- **Adopting a More Global Perspective**: Considering differences in different countries and regions.

3. **Similarities and Differences between Generative AI and Social Media**:
- **Similarities**: Both involve content review, the use of AI, black - box operations, and the abstraction of complex decision - making processes.
- **Differences**: Generative AI is usually single - user interaction, while social media promotes direct connections between users; the content review of generative AI is usually carried out before content generation, while social media reviews after content is published.

### Key Formulas (if applicable)

Since this paper mainly discusses policy and regulatory issues and does not involve specific mathematical, physical, or chemical formulas. If there are relevant formulas, they will be presented in the following Markdown format:

```markdown
$$ E = mc^2 $$
```

### Conclusion

The author hopes to provide a feasible framework for the regulation of generative AI by drawing on the regulatory experience of social media, thereby ensuring that this technology can better benefit society while avoiding potential risks and negative impacts.