The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making

Valerio Capraro,Austin Lentsch,Daron Acemoglu,Selin Akgun,Aisel Akhmedova,Ennio Bilancini,Jean-François Bonnefon,Pablo Brañas-Garza,Luigi Butera,Karen M. Douglas,Jim A.C. Everett,Gerd Gigerenzer,Christine Greenhow,Daniel A. Hashimoto,Julianne Holt-Lunstad,Jolanda Jetten,Simon Johnson,Chiara Longoni,Pete Lunn,Simone Natale,Iyad Rahwan,Neil Selwyn,Vivek Singh,Siddharth Suri,Jennifer Sutcliffe,Joe Tomlinson,Sander van der Linden,Paul A. M. Van Lange,Friederike Wall,Jay J. Van Bavel,Riccardo Viale

2024-05-06

Abstract:Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the impact of Generative AI on socio-economic inequality and policy-making. Specifically, it explores the potential effects of Generative AI in four key areas: information dissemination, work, education, and healthcare. The specific issues the paper seeks to address are as follows:

1. **Information Dissemination**:
- Generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but it may also lead to a surge in misinformation and a decline in the trustworthiness of digital content.

2. **Work**:
- Generative AI can enhance productivity and create new job opportunities, but these benefits may be unevenly distributed across different business sizes, industries, and labor groups.

3. **Education**:
- Generative AI offers opportunities for personalized learning, helping to bridge educational gaps, but it may also exacerbate the digital divide.

4. **Healthcare**:
- Generative AI has significant potential in diagnosis and accessibility, which can improve patient outcomes and make healthcare more widespread, but it may also deepen existing inequalities.

Additionally, the paper discusses the inadequacies of current policy frameworks in addressing these challenges and proposes specific policy measures aimed at promoting shared prosperity through the development of Generative AI. The paper emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to understand and address the complex challenges posed by Generative AI.