Abstract:Quantum key distribution (QKD) can theoretically achieve the Holy Grail of cryptography, information-theoretic security against eavesdropping. However, in practice, discrepancies between the mathematical models assumed in security proofs and the actual functioning of the devices used in implementations prevent it from reaching this goal. Device-independent QKD is currently not a satisfactory solution to this problem, as its performance is extremely poor and most of its security proofs assume that the user devices leak absolutely no information to the outside. On the other hand, measurement-device-independent (MDI) QKD can guarantee security with arbitrarily flawed receivers while achieving high performance, and the remaining challenge is ensuring its security in the presence of source imperfections. So far, all efforts in this regard have come at a price; some proofs are suitable only for particular source imperfections, while others severely compromise the system's performance, i.e., its communication speed and distance. Here, we overcome these crucial problems by presenting a security proof in the finite-key regime against coherent attacks that can incorporate general encoding imperfections and side channels while achieving much higher performances than previous approaches. Moreover, our proof requires minimal state characterization, which facilitates its application to real-life implementations.

Evaluation of quantum key distribution systems against injection-locking attacks

Source attack of decoy-state quantum key distribution using phase information

Hacking on Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution System with Partial Phase Randomization

Quantum key distribution with imperfectly isolated devices

Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect phase randomisation

Imperfect Phase-Randomisation and Generalised Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution

A security framework for quantum key distribution implementations

Physical Security of Chip-Based Quantum Key Distribution Devices

Quantum key distribution with untrusted detectors

Implementing the decoy state protocol in a practically oriented Quantum Key Distribution system-level model

Phase-remapping Attack in Practical Quantum-Key-distribution Systems

Tight Security Bounds for Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution

Implementation security in quantum key distribution

Secret key rate bounds for quantum key distribution with non-uniform phase randomization

Hacking Quantum Key Distribution via Injection Locking

Almost-tight and Versatile Security Analysis of Measurement-Device-independent Quantum Key Distribution

Discrete-phase-randomized measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

Quantum key distribution with an unknown and untrusted source

Concise security bounds for practical decoy-state quantum key distribution

Foiling covert channels and malicious classical post-processing units in quantum key distribution

Attacks exploiting deviation of mean photon number in quantum key distribution and coin tossing