Little to lose: the case for a robust European green hydrogen strategy

Koen van Greevenbroek,Johannes Schmidt,Marianne Zeyringer,Alexander Horsch

2024-12-10

Abstract:The EU targets 10 Mt of green hydrogen production by 2030, but has not committed to targets for 2040. Green hydrogen competes with carbon capture and storage, biomass and imports in reaching emissions reductions; earlier studies have demonstrated the great uncertainty in future cost-optimal development of green hydrogen. In spite of this, we show that Europe risks little by setting green hydrogen production targets at around 25 Mt by 2040. Employing an extensive scenario analysis combined with novel near-optimal techniques, we find that this target results in systems that are within 10% of cost-optimal in most considered scenarios. Setting concrete targets is important in order to resolve significant uncertainty which hampers investments. Targeting green hydrogen reduces the dependence on carbon capture and storage and green fuel imports, making for a more robust European climate strategy.

Systems and Control,Materials Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to explore and solve the problem of uncertainty in the setting of European green hydrogen production targets, especially in the period after 2040. Specifically, the paper attempts to answer the following key questions:

1. **How to set reasonable green hydrogen production targets**: The European Union has set a target of producing 10 million tons (Mt) of green hydrogen per year by 2030, but the target for 2040 has not been clearly defined. Through extensive scenario analysis and novel near - optimal techniques, the paper evaluates the feasibility and economy of setting a 25 Mt green hydrogen production target for 2040 under different assumptions.

2. **Strategies for dealing with future uncertainties**: There is great uncertainty in the future development of green hydrogen, including carbon capture and storage (CCS), biomass utilization, and green fuel imports. The paper studies the impact of these uncertainties on green hydrogen production and proposes setting moderate targets to reduce the risk of relying on other uncertain technologies, thereby enhancing the robustness of Europe's climate strategy.

3. **Cost - benefit analysis**: Despite the uncertainties, the paper shows that setting a moderate green hydrogen production target (such as 25 Mt/year) can remain within the near - cost - optimal range (not exceeding 10% of the optimal cost) in most of the considered scenarios. This helps to reduce investment uncertainty and ensure that climate goals can be achieved even if some technologies do not develop as expected.

4. **Policy recommendations**: The paper emphasizes the importance of setting clear targets to promote investment and technological development. By setting specific green hydrogen production targets, the dependence on CCS and green fuel imports can be reduced, making Europe's net - zero - emission transition more robust.

### The core arguments of the paper

- **Robustness**: Setting a green hydrogen production target of 25 Mt/year is robust and can remain within the near - cost - optimal range in most scenarios.
- **Flexibility**: Even if some technologies do not develop as expected, setting this target can be a "low - regret" option, ensuring that the system cost does not increase significantly.
- **Policy support**: To achieve this target, financial incentives may be required, but the subsidized green hydrogen still has a wide range of values, partially limiting the efficiency loss of the subsidy.

### Formula representation

Some of the key formulas involved in the discussion are as follows:

- **Energy conversion of hydrogen**:
\[
1 \text{ Mt H}_2 = 33.3 \text{ TWh}
\]
This formula is used to convert the mass unit of hydrogen (million tons) into the energy unit (terawatt - hours), using the lower heating value (LHV) of hydrogen.

- **System cost increase limit**:
\[
\text{Total system cost} \leq (1 + \varepsilon) \times \text{Optimal system cost}
\]
where \(\varepsilon\) represents the allowed percentage of cost increase (e.g., 2%, 5%, 10%).

Through these analyses, the paper provides scientific basis and support for formulating a robust green hydrogen production strategy in Europe.