Challenges and Opportunities for Visual Analytics in Jurisprudence

Daniel Fürst,Mennatallah El-Assady,Daniel A. Keim,Maximilian T. Fischer

2024-12-09

Abstract:Exploring, analyzing, and interpreting law can be tedious and challenging, even for legal scholars, since legal texts contain domain-specific language, require knowledge of tacit legal concepts, and are sometimes intentionally ambiguous. In related, text-based domains, Visual Analytics (VA) and large language models (LLMs) have become essential for working with documents as they support data navigation, knowledge representation, and analytical reasoning. However, legal scholars must simultaneously manage hierarchical information sources, leverage implicit domain knowledge, and document complex reasoning processes, which are neither adequately accessible through existing VA designs nor sufficiently supported by current LLMs. To address the needs of legal scholars, we identify previously unexamined challenges and opportunities when applying VA to jurisprudence. We conducted semi-structured interviews with nine experts from the legal domain and found that they lacked the ability to articulate their tacit domain knowledge as explicit, machine-interpretable knowledge. Hence, we propose leveraging interactive visualization for this articulation, teaching the machine relevant semantic relationships between legal documents. These relationships inform the predictions of VA and LLMs, facilitating the navigation between the hierarchies of legal document collections. The enhanced navigation can uncover additional relevant legal documents, reinforcing the legal reasoning process by generating legal insights that reflect internalized, tacit domain knowledge. In summary, we provide a human-is-the-loop VA workflow for jurisprudence that recognizes tacit domain knowledge as essential for deriving legal insights. More broadly, we compare this workflow with related text-based research practices, revealing research gaps and guiding visualization researchers in knowledge-assisted VA for law and beyond.

Human-Computer Interaction

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to address the challenges faced by legal scholars when processing and analyzing legal texts, especially by applying Visual Analytics (VA) to the field of law. Specifically, the author has identified the following main issues:

1. **Data Acquisition and Availability**:
- Many important legal documents, such as legal commentaries and court judgments, are difficult to obtain due to copyright and licensing restrictions, especially in lower - level courts.
- Insufficient digitization results in a large number of legal texts that cannot be processed by automated tools.

2. **Limitations of Search Interfaces**:
- Current legal database platforms (such as beck - online and juris) mainly rely on syntactic search, lack understanding of semantics or context, and cannot support complex query requirements.
- These platforms have limited support for domain - specific languages and are difficult to identify legal concepts that are not explicitly mentioned.

3. **Navigation Complexity**:
- The relationships between legal documents are complex, and existing tools lack the ability to effectively navigate these relationships, causing scholars to need to manually search for related documents.
- There is a lack of systematic tools to help scholars understand and navigate the hierarchical and semantic relationships of legal texts.

4. **Dependence on Tacit Knowledge**:
- Legal scholars must rely on tacit domain - specific knowledge when interpreting legal norms and identifying relationships, a process that is both time - consuming and error - prone.
- Tacit knowledge is difficult to transform into explicit, machine - interpretable knowledge, thus limiting the application effectiveness of AI and VA.

5. **Inefficiency of Current Interfaces**:
- Existing legal research platforms (such as beck - online and juris) focus on syntactic search and lack understanding of semantics and context, resulting in inefficiency.

### Solutions

To solve the above problems, the author proposes a Visual Analytics - based workflow design, which is divided into three stages:

1. **Discovery & Scoping**:
- Help legal scholars identify and screen relevant legal texts to solve research problems.
- Use interactive visualization tools to enhance the initial screening and classification capabilities of legal texts.

2. **Analysis & Interpretation**:
- Support scholars in analyzing the identified documents and understanding the relationships between legal norms and content therein.
- Provide tools to map and visualize the semantic and hierarchical relationships between legal texts, reducing the workload of manual search.

3. **Synthesis & Documentation**:
- Assist scholars in integrating analysis results, generating analysis artifacts, and capturing explicit and tacit knowledge.
- Through visualization tools, help scholars record and communicate their reasoning processes and conclusions more effectively.

In addition, the author also proposes a "human - in - the - loop" VA design, emphasizing the importance of transforming tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge, thereby improving the efficiency and accuracy of legal research. Through this method, scholars can better utilize AI and VA tools and improve their ability to interpret and apply legal texts.