A Construction of the Symmetric Monoidal Structure of the Geometric Whittaker Model

Ashutosh Roy Choudhury,Tanmay Deshpande
2024-12-06
Abstract:Let $G$ be a connected reductive algebraic group over an algebraically closed field $k$ of characteristic $p > 0$ and let $\ell$ be a prime number different from $p$. Let $U \subseteq G$ be a maximal unipotent subgroup, $T$ a maximal torus normalizing $U$ and $W$ the Weyl group of $G$. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be a non-degenerate multiplicative $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell} $-local system on $U$. In \cite{bd}, the authors show that the bi-Whittaker category, namely the triangulated monoidal category of $(U, \mathcal{L})$-biequivariant $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell}$-complexes on $G$ is monoidally equivalent to an explicit thick triangulated monoidal subcategory $\mathscrsfs{D}_{W}^{\circ}(T) \subseteq \mathscrsfs{D}_{W}(T)$ of "central sheaves" on the torus. In particular it has the structure of a symmetric monoidal category coming from the symmetric monoidal structure on $\mathscrsfs{D}_W(T)$. In this paper, we give another construction of a symmetric monoidal structure on the above category and prove that it agrees with the one coming from the above construction. For this, among other things, we generalize a proof by Gelfand (ref. \cite{car}) for finite groups to the geometric setup.
Representation Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to construct and prove a new symmetric monoidal structure in the geometric Whittaker model. Specifically, the author hopes to define a new symmetric monoidal structure on the given double Whittaker category \( e_L D(G) e_L \) and prove that this structure is consistent with the structure given in the previous literature [BD23]. ### Description of the Main Problem 1. **Constructing the Symmetric Monoidal Structure**: - The author attempts to construct a symmetric monoidal structure by geometrizing Gelfand's proof of the uniqueness of the Whittaker model. This involves defining a canonical anti - automorphism \( \Psi: G \to G \) and using this anti - automorphism to build the required structure. 2. **Verifying Consistency**: - The author needs to prove that the newly constructed symmetric monoidal structure is equivalent to the already existing structure in the literature [BD23]. To this end, they introduce a natural isomorphism \( \theta: \Psi^* \to \text{Id} \) and extend this isomorphism to the entire double Whittaker category \( e_L D(G) e_L \). ### Key Steps and Methods - **Construction of the Anti - automorphism \( \Psi \)**: - Given a non - degenerate multiplicative local system \( L \) and a fixed choice \( \psi \), the author constructs a unique anti - automorphism \( \Psi \) such that \( \Psi(T)=T \), \( \Psi(U)=U \), and \( \Psi^* L \cong L \). - **Construction of the Natural Isomorphism \( \theta \)**: - The author decomposes the problem into smaller parts by Bruhat decomposition, that is, constructs the natural isomorphism \( \theta \) on each Bruhat cell. Then, they use Beilinson's perverse sheaves gluing technique to glue these isomorphisms into a natural isomorphism on the entire category. - **Verifying the Symmetric Monoidal Structure**: - Finally, the author proves that the constructed natural isomorphism \( \theta \) indeed endows \( e_L D(G) e_L \) with a symmetric monoidal structure and that this structure is consistent with the results in [BD23]. ### Mathematical Formulas - Properties of the Anti - automorphism \( \Psi \): \[ \Psi(T) = T, \quad \Psi(U) = U, \quad \Psi^* L \cong L \] - Natural Isomorphism \( \theta \): \[ \theta: \Psi^* \to \text{Id} \] - Representation in Bruhat Decomposition: \[ G=\bigcup_{w \in W} U \cdot T_w \cdot U \] Through the above methods, the author successfully constructs and verifies a new symmetric monoidal structure within an important mathematical framework, which is of great significance for understanding the geometric Whittaker model.