AI and the law

Henry A. Thompson

2024-12-06

Abstract:I argue that generative AI will have an uneven effect on the evolution of the law. To do so, I consider generative AI as a labor-augmenting technology that reduces the cost of both writing more complete contracts and litigating in court. The contracting effect reduces the demand for court services by making contracts more complete. The litigation effect, by contrast, increases the demand for court services by a) making contracts less complete and b) reducing litigants' incentive to settle, all else equal. Where contracts are common, as in property and contract law, the change in the quantity of litigation is uncertain due to offsetting contracting and litigation effects. However, in areas where contracts are rare, as in tort law, the amount of litigation is likely to rise. Following Rubin (1977) and Priest (1977) generative AI will accelerate the evolution of tort law toward efficiency.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore the impact of generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI) on the evolution of law. Specifically, the author believes that generative AI, as a labor - enhancing technology, will influence the development of law through two main channels:

1. **Contracting Effect**: Generative AI will assist lawyers in writing more complete contracts, which can reduce the demand for court services. Because more complete contracts can better anticipate possible future problems, thus reducing disputes arising from unclear contracts.

2. **Litigation Effect**: Generative AI will lower litigation costs, which will increase the demand for court services. Because lower litigation costs mean that parties are more inclined to choose litigation rather than settlement when facing disputes.

The manifestations of these two effects may vary in different legal fields. For example, in contract law and property law, since contracts are more common, the contracting effect and the litigation effect may offset each other, making the change in the number of lawsuits uncertain. In tort law, since contracts are less common, the litigation effect is more significant, so the number of lawsuits may increase. According to Rubin (1977) and Priest (1977), generative AI will accelerate the development of tort law in a more efficient direction.

In conclusion, the core issue of this paper is to explore how generative AI affects the speed and direction of the evolution of law by changing the integrity of contracts and the cost of litigation.