Abstract:Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (AI) can create sophisticated textual and multimodal content readily available to students. Writing intensive courses and disciplines that use writing as a major form of assessment are significantly impacted by advancements in generative AI, as the technology has the potential to revolutionize how students write and how they perceive writing as a fundamental literacy skill. However, educators are still at the beginning stage of understanding students’ integration of generative AI in their actual writing process. This study addresses the urgent need to uncover how students engage with ChatGPT throughout different components of their writing processes and their perceptions of the opportunities and challenges of generative AI. Adopting a phenomenological research design, the study explored the writing practices of six students, including both native and nonnative English speakers, in a first-year writing class at a higher education institution in the US. Thematic analysis of students’ written products, self-reflections, and interviews suggests that students utilized ChatGPT for brainstorming and organizing ideas as well as assisting with both global (e.g., argument, structure, coherence) and local issues of writing (e.g., syntax, diction, grammar), while they also had various ethical and practical concerns about the use of ChatGPT. The study brought to front two dilemmas encountered by students in their generative AI-assisted writing: (1) the challenging balance between incorporating AI to enhance writing and maintaining their authentic voice, and (2) the dilemma of weighing the potential loss of learning experiences against the emergence of new learning opportunities accompanying AI integration. These dilemmas highlight the need to rethink learning in an increasingly AI-mediated educational context, emphasizing the importance of fostering students’ critical AI literacy to promote their authorial voice and learning in AI-human collaboration.

From Quills to Algorithms: Navigating the Impact of Generative AI on Legal Writing Assessments While Preparing Students for the NextGen Bar Exam

Student and Faculty Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Student Writing

ChatGPT, I have a Legal Question? The Impact of Generative AI Tools on Law Clinics and Access to Justice

Is AI changing learning and assessment as we know it? Evidence from a ChatGPT experiment and a conceptual framework

Changes and challenges of legal education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Chinese experience

ChatGPT and the future of legal education and practice

Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process

AI-Powered Curricula: Unpacking the Potential and Progress of Generative Technologies in Education

AI-generated feedback on writing: insights into efficacy and ENL student preference

Navigating the Impact of ChatGPT/GPT4 on Legal Academic Examinations: Challenges, Opportunities and Recommendations

ChatGPT Goes to Law School

Generative AI: Implications and Applications for Education

Exploring Students’ Generative AI-Assisted Writing Processes: Perceptions and Experiences from Native and Nonnative English Speakers

The Case for Nurturing AI Literacy in Law Schools

Generative AI in Higher Education: Seeing ChatGPT Through Universities' Policies, Resources, and Guidelines

Approaches to Generative Artificial Intelligence, A Social Justice Perspective

Weaving Pathways for Justice with GPT: LLM-driven automated drafting of interactive legal applications

Exploring Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Generative AI in College Writing: An Experience Report

How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative Artificial Intelligence? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey

Generative AI Usage and Exam Performance

Using Generative AI to Promote Psychological, Feedback, and Artificial Intelligence Literacies in Undergraduate Psychology