Abstract:We study an optimal control problem encompassing investment, consumption, and retirement decisions under exponential (CARA-type) utility. The financial market comprises a bond with constant drift and a stock following geometric Brownian motion. The agent receives continuous income, consumes over time, and has the option to retire irreversibly, gaining increased leisure post-retirement compared to pre-retirement. The objective is to maximize the expected exponential utility of weighted consumption and leisure over an infinite horizon. Using a martingale approach and dual value function, we derive implicit solutions for the optimal portfolio, consumption, and retirement time. The analysis highlights key contributions: first, the equivalent condition for no retirement is characterized by a specific income threshold; second, the influence of income and leisure levels on optimal portfolio, consumption, and retirement decisions is thoroughly examined. These results provide valuable insights into the interplay between financial and lifestyle choices in retirement planning.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to study how individuals make optimal investment, consumption and retirement decisions under the exponential (CARA - type) utility function. Specifically, the paper considers a financial market with a bond and a stock, where individuals can continuously obtain labor income and consume, and can also choose to irreversibly retire and enjoy more leisure time after retirement. The goal is to maximize the expected exponential utility, which consists of weighted consumption and leisure, over an infinite time horizon.
#### Main problems and contributions:
1. **Equivalent conditions for not retiring**:
- The paper derives a specific income threshold condition. When an individual's income \( Y \) exceeds this threshold, they will never choose to retire. This condition depends on the consumption weight parameter \( \alpha \) and the difference in leisure levels before and after retirement \( L - L \).
- The specific expression is: if \( Y \geq \frac{1 - \alpha}{\alpha}(L - L) \), then the individual will not retire.
2. **The influence of income and leisure on decisions**:
- The paper analyzes the influence of labor income \( Y \), pre - retirement leisure \( L \) and post - retirement leisure \( L \) on optimal consumption, portfolio selection and retirement timing.
- The results show that the retirement wealth threshold \( \bar{x} \) increases with the increase of \( Y \) and \( L \), but decreases with the increase of \( L \).
- It is further found that the optimal consumption and portfolio selection after retirement are independent of \( Y, L, L \), while before retirement, the optimal consumption and portfolio selection show a monotonically increasing or decreasing trend with respect to \( L \).
#### Mathematical models and methods:
- Use the martingale method and the dual value function to solve the implicit solutions of the optimal portfolio, consumption rate and retirement time.
- Introduce the Hamilton - Jacobi - Bellman (HJB) equation and the Lagrange multiplier method, combined with the optimal stopping problem framework, to effectively model and analyze the decision - making process.
#### Research significance:
- This research provides valuable insights into the interaction between labor income, leisure preferences and financial decisions, especially in the case of voluntary retirement.
- It provides a new perspective on how to comprehensively consider economic and lifestyle choices in financial planning.
Through these analyses, this paper provides theoretical support for individuals' decision - making in retirement planning and lays a foundation for further research.