The Collaborative Practices and Motivations of Online Communities Dedicated to Voluntary Misinformation Response

Jina Yoon,Shreya Sathyanarayanan,Franziska Roesner,Amy X. Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3701209

2024-11-28

Abstract:Responding to misinformation online can be an exhausting and thankless task. It takes time and energy to write effective content, puts users at risk of online harassment, and strains personal relationships. Despite these challenges, there are people who voluntarily respond to misinformation online, and some have established communities on platforms such as Reddit, Discord, and X (formerly Twitter) dedicated to these efforts. In this work, we interviewed 8 people who participate in such communities to understand the type of support they receive from each other in these discussion spaces. Interviewees described that their communities helped them sustain motivation, save time, and improve their communication skills. Common practices included sharing sources and citations, providing emotional support, giving others advice, and signaling positive feedback. We present our findings as three case studies and discuss opportunities for future work to support collaborative practices in online communities dedicated to misinformation response. Our work surfaces how resource sharing, social motivation, and decentralization can make misinformation correction more sustainable, rewarding, and effective for online citizens.

Human-Computer Interaction

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to understand and support the collaborative practices and motivations of voluntary responses to misinformation in online communities?**

Specifically, the author interviewed eight users participating in such communities and explored the following research questions:

1. **RQ1: What factors motivate people to voluntarily respond to misinformation?**
2. **RQ2: What are the community purposes of the responders?**
3. **RQ3: What are the factors that influence the collaborative practices within these communities?**
4. **RQ4: What can we learn from existing communities and apply to future community - oriented misinformation intervention measures?**

### Research Background

Responding to misinformation is a time - consuming and challenging task. It not only requires a great deal of time and energy to write effective response content, but also may expose users to the risk of cyber - harassment and put pressure on personal relationships. Nevertheless, there are still many people who voluntarily respond to misinformation online and have established specialized communities on platforms such as Reddit, Discord and X (formerly Twitter).

### Research Methods

Researchers collected data from three different online communities through semi - structured interviews and organized them into three case studies:

- **Case 1**: Community Notes contributors in the Discord server, focusing on politically - balanced fact - checking.
- **Case 2**: r/QAnonCasualties and its related communities, providing support for people affected by conspiracy theories.
- **Case 3**: r/vaxxhappened sub - forum, where users share and refute misleading information.

### Main Findings

1. **Resource Sharing and Information Support**: Community members save a great deal of time and energy by sharing sources and reference materials.
2. **Social Support and Emotional Encouragement**: Interactions within the community provide emotional support and positive feedback, helping to maintain members' motivation.
3. **Decentralized Communication Methods**: The decentralized community structure makes communication more localized and engaging.

### Conclusions and Future Work

This study reveals the collaborative practices and motivations of online communities in responding to misinformation and emphasizes the importance of resource sharing, social motivation and decentralization. Future research should further explore the operation models of these communities in different global cultural backgrounds to better support and enhance the ability of online citizens to respond to misinformation.

### Related Formulas

This article does not involve specific mathematical, physical, chemical or biological formulas, but emphasizes the application of qualitative analysis methods, such as Braun & Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis method:

\[
\text{Reflexive thematic analysis method}=\text{Open - ended coding}+\text{Theme development}+\text{Comparison of coding results}
\]

Through this method, researchers can systematically analyze interview data and extract key themes and patterns.