Abstract:It has been proposed that if the gravitational constant $G$ abruptly decreased around 130 Myr ago, then Type Ia supernovae (SNe) in the Hubble flow would have a different luminosity to those in host galaxies with Cepheid distances. This would make Hubble flow SNe more distant, causing redshifts to rise slower with distance, potentially solving the Hubble tension. We find that since the luminosities of Sun-like stars scale as approximately $G^7$, the Solar luminosity would have dropped substantially 130 Myr ago in this scenario, pushing Earth into a planetary glaciation. However, there was no Snowball Earth episode in the last 500 Myr. The $G$ step model (GSM) also implies that the length of a year would have abruptly increased by about 10%, but the number of days per year has evolved broadly continuously according to geochronometry and cyclostratigraphy. The GSM would drastically alter stellar evolution, causing the Sun to have exhausted about 2/3 of its fuel supply rather than 1/2. This would lead to the helioseismic age of the Sun differing from that of the oldest meteorite samples, but these agree excellently in practice. There is also excellent agreement between the standard expansion history and that traced by cosmic chronometers, but these would disagree severely in the GSM. Moreover, distance indicators that use stellar luminosities would differ drastically beyond 40 Mpc from those that do not. These arguments cast very severe doubt on the viability of the GSM: the solution to the Hubble tension must be sought elsewhere.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the inconsistency between the measured value of the Hubble constant \(H_0\) and the standard cosmological model (ΛCDM model), namely the so - called "Hubble tension" problem. Specifically, the ΛCDM model calibrated by the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) data predicts a Hubble constant \(H_0 = 67.6\pm0.5 \, \text{km/s/Mpc}\), while the local Hubble constant \(c z' \approx 73.0\pm1.0 \, \text{km/s/Mpc}\) observed using different distance indicators (such as type Ia supernovae) is significantly higher. This difference is called the Hubble tension.
The paper proposes a hypothesis that if the gravitational constant \(G\) suddenly decreased about 130 million years ago, then the luminosity of type Ia supernovae (SNe) in the Hubble flow would be different from those in the host galaxies (the distance is measured by the Cepheid variable or the tip of the red - giant - branch method). This would cause the SNe in the Hubble flow to appear farther away, thus making the redshift increase more slowly with distance, and possibly solving the Hubble tension problem.
However, by analyzing evidence from multiple aspects such as the solar system, stellar evolution, and geological records, the paper points out that this hypothesis has several serious problems, including:
1. **Solar luminosity change**: Since the solar luminosity \(L_\odot\propto G^7\), if \(G\) suddenly decreases, the solar luminosity will be significantly reduced, causing the Earth to enter an ice age. But geological records show that no such ice - age event has occurred in the past 500 million years.
2. **Earth's orbital change**: A decrease in \(G\) will cause the Earth's orbit to expand, and the length of a year will increase by about 10%. Geological records (such as coral growth patterns) show that the change in the number of days in a year has been smooth in the past few hundred million years, without a sudden increase.
3. **Lunar tidal evolution**: A decrease in \(G\) will also cause the lunar orbit to expand, weaken the tidal effect on the Earth, and then affect the change in the Earth's rotation speed. Geological records show that the change in the Earth's rotation speed has been smooth in the past few hundred million years, without any sudden change.
4. **Other distance indicators**: Besides the traditional Cepheid - type Ia supernovae route, there are many other methods to measure the local Hubble constant, and the results of these methods are very consistent. If \(G\) has mutated, the results of these methods should be significantly different, but this is not the case in reality.
5. **Stellar age and cosmic chronometers**: Assuming that \(G\) has mutated will cause the stellar evolution speed to increase, making the ages of ancient stars inconsistent with actual observations. In addition, the cosmic expansion history measured by cosmic chronometers (such as "red - and - dead" elliptical galaxies) is also very consistent with the standard model, further excluding the possibility of a \(G\) mutation.
In conclusion, the paper believes that the hypothesis of a sudden change in the gravitational constant \(G\) cannot explain the Hubble tension problem and faces many insurmountable difficulties. Therefore, other ways need to be found to solve the Hubble tension problem.