Abstract:Background. The global COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a fundamental reexamination of how human psychological research can be conducted both safely and robustly in a new era of digital working and physical distancing. Online web-based testing has risen to the fore as a promising solution for rapid mass collection of cognitive data without requiring human contact. However, a long-standing debate exists over the data quality and validity of web-based studies. Here, we examine the opportunities and challenges afforded by the societal shift toward web-based testing, highlight an urgent need to establish a standard data quality assurance framework for online studies, and develop and validate a new supervised online testing methodology, remote guided testing (RGT). Methods. A total of 85 healthy young adults were tested on 10 cognitive tasks assessing executive functioning (flexibility, memory and inhibition) and learning. Tasks were administered either face-to-face in the laboratory (N=41) or online using remote guided testing (N=44), delivered using identical web-based platforms (CANTAB, Inquisit and i-ABC). Data quality was assessed using detailed trial-level measures (missed trials, outlying and excluded responses, response times), as well as overall task performance measures. Results. The results indicated that, across all measures of data quality and performance, RGT data was statistically-equivalent to data collected in person in the lab. Moreover, RGT participants out-performed the lab group on measured verbal intelligence, which could reflect test environment differences, including possible effects of mask-wearing on communication. Conclusions. These data suggest that the RGT methodology could help to ameliorate concerns regarding online data quality and - particularly for studies involving high-risk or rare cohorts - offer an alternative for collecting high-quality human cognitive data without requiring in-person physical attendance.

Test Security in Remote Testing Age: Perspectives from Process Data Analytics and AI

Test Security and the Pandemic: Comparison of Test Center and Online Proctor Delivery Modalities

Internet‐Based Proctored Assessment: Security and Fairness Issues

Examining the Examiners: Students' Privacy and Security Perceptions of Online Proctoring Services

A New Remote Guided Method for Supervised Web-Based Cognitive Testing to Ensure High Quality Data

A New Remote Guided Method for Supervised Web-Based Cognitive Testing to Ensure High-Quality Data: Development and Usability Study

Remote Proctoring in Language Testing: Implications for Fairness and Justice

Educators' Perspectives of Using (or Not Using) Online Exam Proctoring

Good proctor or "Big Brother"? AI Ethics and Online Exam Supervision Technologies

Watching the watchers: bias and vulnerability in remote proctoring software

Responsible AI for Test Equity and Quality: The Duolingo English Test as a Case Study

Design and Application of a Response-Driven Adaptive Test System

A Robust Computerized Adaptive Testing Approach in Educational Question Retrieval

Testing Software in Age of Data Privacy: a Balancing Act.

Robust Testing of AI Language Model Resiliency with Novel Adversarial Prompts

Using Keystroke Behavior Patterns to Detect Nonauthentic Texts in Writing Assessments: Evaluating the Fairness of Predictive Models

A Review of Standardised Assessment Development Procedure and Algorithms for Computer Adaptive Testing: Applications and Relevance for Fourth Industrial Revolution

On the Advances and Challenges of Adaptive Online Testing

Test-takers have a say: understanding the implications of the use of AI in language tests

A Visual Analytics Approach to Facilitate the Proctoring of Online Exams

Automated smart artificial intelligence-based proctoring system using deep learning