Abstract:In the rapidly advancing field of Artificial Intelligence (AI), this study presents a critical evaluation of the resilience and cybersecurity efficacy of leading AI models, including ChatGPT-4, Bard, Claude, and Microsoft Copilot. Central to this research are innovative adversarial prompts designed to rigorously test the content moderation capabilities of these AI systems. This study introduces new adversarial tests and the Response Quality Score (RQS), a metric specifically developed to assess the nuances of AI responses. Additionally, the research spotlights FreedomGPT, an AI tool engineered to optimize the alignment between user intent and AI interpretation. The empirical results from this investigation are pivotal for assessing AI models' current robustness and security. They highlight the necessity for ongoing development and meticulous testing to bolster AI defenses against various adversarial challenges. Notably, this study also delves into the ethical and societal implications of employing advanced "jailbreak" techniques in AI testing. The findings are significant for understanding AI vulnerabilities and formulating strategies to enhance AI technologies' reliability and ethical soundness, paving the way for safer and more secure AI applications.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the robustness and security of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) language models when faced with complex adversarial prompts. Specifically, the research focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Evaluating the vulnerability of AI models**: Through the design of new adversarial testing methods, especially the introduction of **Hypothetical (HYP) prompts** and **Conditional Red (CR) prompts**, the research evaluates the reactions of current leading AI language models (such as ChatGPT - 4, Bard, Claude, and Microsoft Copilot) to complex adversarial prompts. These prompts are designed to test the models' content - moderation capabilities and their ability to handle morally complex content. 2. **Revealing ethical boundaries and security limitations**: Through adversarial prompts, the research aims to reveal the ethical boundaries and security limitations of AI models when faced with illegal or unethical requests. This helps to understand the potential risks of these models in practical applications and propose improvement measures. 3. **Optimizing the interaction between user intent and AI interpretation**: The research also explores how to improve the interaction between user intent and AI interpretation through intermediate AI assistants or customized GPT models, thereby enhancing the usability and reliability of AI systems. ### Research background and related work The paper points out that with the rapid development of AI technology, although it has brought many positive impacts, it has also triggered challenges in system robustness and network security. In particular, adversarial prompts (such as through advanced prompt engineering and "jailbreaking" techniques) can be used to test the ability of AI models to handle ethically and legally complex situations. These challenges not only affect the security of AI but also involve ethical and social responsibility issues. ### Methodology The methods adopted in the research include: - **Re - evaluation of movie - script prompts**: By simulating scenes in movie scripts and making AI models play specific roles, to test their reaction mechanisms in fictional environments. - **Hypothetical (HYP) prompts**: Designed to bypass the standard ethical filters of AI models, requiring the models to describe immoral behaviors in detail from the perspective of specific roles. - **Conditional Red (CR) prompts**: Through role - playing, making AI models play an unethical and legally - unjudged computer role (UCAR) to test their ability to generate detailed dialogues in fictional environments without ethical norms. ### Evaluation process The research evaluates the response quality of AI models through a detailed scoring system, including detail level (DS), precision level (PS), ethical adherence score (EAS), and severity score (SS). Finally, the response quality score (RQS) is calculated by integrating these indicators to comprehensively evaluate the robustness and security of the models. ### Ethical considerations The research particularly emphasizes the ethical dilemmas of adversarial testing, including how to balance the need to reveal vulnerabilities and the risk of preventing malicious exploitation. In addition, the research also discusses the principles of responsible disclosure, strategies for mitigating potential harm, and the importance of formulating ethical AI research guidelines in the future. ### Public policy development The paper also puts forward policy recommendations, including formulating policies to encourage responsible AI development, establishing regulatory frameworks, promoting cooperation among stakeholders, and raising education and public awareness, to ensure the healthy development and safe application of AI technology. In conclusion, this research aims to reveal the vulnerability and security problems of AI language models when faced with complex prompts through systematic adversarial testing, thereby promoting the development of safer and more reliable AI technology.

Robust Testing of AI Language Model Resiliency with Novel Adversarial Prompts

ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models

PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Prompts

PromptBench: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Prompts

Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Model-Based System and Mitigating Strategies: A Case Study on ChatGPT

She had Cobalt Blue Eyes: Prompt Testing to Create Aligned and Sustainable Language Models

"Moralized" Multi-Step Jailbreak Prompts: Black-Box Testing of Guardrails in Large Language Models for Verbal Attacks

On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models

Robust Prompt Optimization for Defending Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks

Navigating the Shadows: Unveiling Effective Disturbances for Modern AI Content Detectors

On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspective

SelfPrompt: Autonomously Evaluating LLM Robustness via Domain-Constrained Knowledge Guidelines and Refined Adversarial Prompts

From Adversarial Arms Race to Model-centric Evaluation: Motivating a Unified Automatic Robustness Evaluation Framework

Robust Safety Classifier for Large Language Models: Adversarial Prompt Shield

Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Large Language Models: Old and New Threats

Fortifying Ethical Boundaries in AI: Advanced Strategies for Enhancing Security in Large Language Models

ASTPrompter: Weakly Supervised Automated Language Model Red-Teaming to Identify Likely Toxic Prompts

An Adversarially-Learned Turing Test for Dialog Generation Models

A Preliminary Study on Using Large Language Models in Software Pentesting

A LLM Assisted Exploitation of AI-Guardian

Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicity