Disagreement Spillovers

Giampaolo Bonomi

2024-11-18

Abstract:As US political party leaders increasingly take stances both on economic and cultural (i.e., social policy) issues, the economic views of opposite cultural groups are growing apart. This paper explores a novel explanation for this phenomenon. I provide experimental evidence that adding social policy content to a policy message pushes those disagreeing with the social policy to disagree also with the economic content of the message. As my results suggest regular deviations from Bayesian explanations, I propose a model of identity-based belief updating that predicts the main regularities found in the experiment. Finally, I shed light on opinion leaders' incentives to strengthen the association between social policy and economic policy views.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **In the process of political information transmission, how do social policy stances affect voters' acceptance of economic policies and lead to the intensification of differences in economic policy views among different cultural groups?**

Specifically, the author explores whether voters will reject economic policy suggestions from the same source because they do not agree with the social policy part when a political message contains both social policies (such as abortion, LGBT rights, etc.) and economic policies (such as trade policies, tax policies, etc.). This phenomenon is called "disagreement spillovers". In addition, the author also studies whether this effect will lead to more intense opposition from voters to economic policies, that is, "backlash".

### Main contributions:
1. **Experimental verification**: Through experiments, the author found that when political information contains content contrary to voters' social views, voters' support for economic policies decreases significantly. For example, information supporting the free - trade agreement (CPTPP), if accompanied by anti - abortion views, will make voters who support abortion less willing to support the free - trade agreement.

2. **Identity - based belief update model**: The author proposes an identity - based belief update model to explain why voters will be biased against economic policies due to differences in social policies. This model believes that when information threatens voters' cultural identity, they will be more inclined to reject information from opposing groups.

3. **Incentive analysis of opinion leaders**: The author further analyzes how politicians and the media can use this "disagreement spillovers" to increase economic policy differences among different cultural groups by strengthening the association between social policies and economic policies, thereby consolidating their voter base.

### Key conclusions:
- **Disagreement spillovers**: When political information contains content contrary to voters' social views, voters' support for economic policies will decrease significantly.
- **Backlash**: In some cases, voters will not only reject economic policy suggestions but also take the opposite position.
- **Lack of consistent spillovers**: Adding content consistent with voters' social views will not significantly increase their support for economic policies.

These findings reveal the complex interaction between social policies and economic policies and how this interaction affects voters' behavior and political polarization.