Social Learning in Lung Transplant Decision

Laura Doval,Federico Echenique Wanying Huang,Yi Xin

2024-11-16

Abstract:We study the allocation of deceased-donor lungs to patients in need of a transplant. Patients make sequential decisions in an order dictated by a priority policy. Using data from a prominent Organ Procurement Organization in the United States, we provide reduced-form evidence of social learning: because patients accept or reject organs in sequence, their decisions exhibit herding behavior, often rejecting an organ that would otherwise be accepted. We develop and estimate a structural model to quantify the impact of various policy proposals and informational regimes. Our results show that blinding patients to their position in the sequence\textemdash thereby eliminating social learning\textemdash boosts organ allocation but reduces average utility per patient. In contrast, prioritizing patients by their likelihood of acceptance exacerbates social learning, leading to fewer organ allocations. Nevertheless, it raises utility per accepted organ and expedites the allocation process.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to study and evaluate the impact of social learning on organ allocation efficiency and patient welfare in the decision - making process of lung transplantation. Specifically, the author focuses on:

1. **Sequential decision - making in organ allocation**:
- When a donor lung becomes available, it will be offered to a list of patients waiting for transplantation in order of priority. Each patient needs to decide whether to accept this organ within a short time according to their own situation and doctor's advice.

2. **The phenomenon of social learning**:
- When making a decision, patients not only rely on their own assessment of organ quality, but are also influenced by the decisions of previous patients. If a higher - priority patient rejects an organ, a lower - priority patient may infer that the organ is of poor quality and thus also choose to reject it. This behavior is known as the "herd effect" or "conformity behavior".

3. **Information transparency and policy implications**:
- The study explores how different levels of information transparency (such as whether to inform patients of their position in the matching sequence) and different priority - ranking strategies (such as ranking by acceptance probability) affect the final organ allocation rate and patient satisfaction.

4. **Optimizing the organ allocation system**:
- By constructing a structured model and conducting counterfactual experiments, the author evaluates a variety of possible improvement measures, including hiding the matching order position, changing the priority - ranking rules, etc., in order to find the best solution that can both improve organ utilization and maximize patient benefits.

In summary, the core problem of this paper is: how to design a more effective organ allocation mechanism so that more high - quality organs can be appropriately allocated to patients who really need them, and reduce unnecessary rejections caused by social learning. This involves not only technical - level optimization, but also the influence of ethical and social - psychological factors.