Abstract:Birds exhibit a variety of flight styles, primarily classified as flapping, which is characterized by rapid up-and-down wing movements, and soaring, which involves gliding with wings outstretched. Each species usually performs specific flight styles, and this has been argued in terms of morphological and physiological adaptation. However, it remains a challenge to evaluate the contribution of each factor to the difference in flight styles. In this study, using phenotypic data from 635 migratory bird species, such as body mass, wing length, and breeding periods, we quantified the relative importance of each feature using Feature Importance and SHAP values, and used them to construct weighted L1 distance matrices and construct NJ trees. Comparison with traditional phylogenetic logistic regression revealed similarity in top-ranked features, but also differences in overall weight distributions and clustering patterns in NJ trees. Our results highlight the complexity of constructing a biologically useful distance matrix from correlated phenotypic features, while the complementary nature of these weighting methods suggests the potential utility of multi-faceted approaches to assessing feature contributions.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the contributions of different features to the differences in bird flight patterns. Specifically, the research aims to quantify the effects of various morphological, physiological and ecological features on bird flight patterns (mainly flapping flight and gliding flight) through machine - learning methods (such as Feature Importance and SHAP values), and compare the results of these methods with those of traditional phylogenetic logistic regression. The following is a specific description of the problem: 1. **Background**: - Birds exhibit multiple flight patterns, mainly divided into flapping flight (flying by rapidly flapping their wings up and down) and gliding flight (gliding with wings spread). Each bird species usually performs a specific flight pattern, which is considered to be related to its morphological and physiological adaptations. - However, it is still challenging to evaluate the specific contributions of each factor to the differences in flight patterns. 2. **Research Objectives**: - Use the phenotypic data (such as body weight, wing length, breeding period, etc.) of 635 migratory birds to quantify the relative importance of each feature. - Construct a weighted L1 - distance matrix through Feature Importance and SHAP values, and construct Neighbor - Joining trees. - Compare the results of machine - learning methods with those of traditional phylogenetic logistic regression to reveal similarities and differences. 3. **Research Questions**: - How to quantify the contributions of different features to the differences in bird flight patterns? - What are the similarities and differences between machine - learning methods (such as FI and SHAP) and traditional phylogenetic logistic regression in evaluating feature contributions? - Can constructing a biologically meaningful distance matrix lead to a better understanding of the evolution of bird flight patterns? Through the answers to these questions, the research hopes to reveal the complex feature relationships behind bird flight patterns and demonstrate the potential application value of machine - learning methods in this field.

Machine learning approaches to explore important features behind bird flight modes

Functional Morphology of Gliding Flight I: Modeling Reveals Distinct Performance Landscapes Based on Soaring Strategies

Assessing the predictive value of morphological traits on primary lifestyle of birds through the extreme gradient boosting algorithm

Towards detailed and interpretable hybrid modeling of continental-scale bird migration

Wing morphology and flight behavior of pelecaniform seabirds

Decoding Typical Flight States Based on Neural Signals from the Midbrain Motor Nuclei of Pigeons

Classifying behavior from short-interval biologging data: An example with GPS tracking of birds

Identifying critical kinematic features of animate motion and contribution to animacy perception

Robustness Strategies in Bio-Inspired Flight Systems: Morphology, Dynamics, and Flight Control

Morphological Adaptations to Migration in Birds

The influence of flight style on the aerodynamic properties of avian wings as fixed lifting surfaces

Machine learning for modeling animal movement

Study on Machine Learning Methods for General Aviation Flight Phase Identification

Elevational constraints on flight efficiency shape global gradients in avian wing morphology

Double vision: 2D and 3D mosquito trajectories can be as valuable for behaviour analysis via machine learning

A review of bird-like flapping wing with high aspect ratio

Why morphology matters in birds and UAV's: How scale affects attitude wind sensitivity

Anisotropic Interaction Rules in Circular Motions of Pigeon Flocks: an Empirical Study Based on Sparse Bayesian Learning

Aircraft Behavior Recognition on Trajectory Data with a Multimodal Approach

Flight activity and effort of breeding pied flycatchers in the wild, revealed with accelerometers and machine learning

Experience does not change the importance of wind support for migratory route selection by a soaring bird