Abstract:We study the problem of learning a single neuron with respect to the $L_2^2$-loss in the presence of adversarial distribution shifts, where the labels can be arbitrary, and the goal is to find a ``best-fit'' function. More precisely, given training samples from a reference distribution $\mathcal{p}_0$, the goal is to approximate the vector $\mathbf{w}^*$ which minimizes the squared loss with respect to the worst-case distribution that is close in $\chi^2$-divergence to $\mathcal{p}_{0}$. We design a computationally efficient algorithm that recovers a vector $ \hat{\mathbf{w}}$ satisfying $\mathbb{E}_{\mathcal{p}^*} (\sigma(\hat{\mathbf{w}} \cdot \mathbf{x}) - y)^2 \leq C \, \mathbb{E}_{\mathcal{p}^*} (\sigma(\mathbf{w}^* \cdot \mathbf{x}) - y)^2 + \epsilon$, where $C>1$ is a dimension-independent constant and $(\mathbf{w}^*, \mathcal{p}^*)$ is the witness attaining the min-max risk $\min_{\mathbf{w}~:~\|\mathbf{w}\| \leq W} \max_{\mathcal{p}} \mathbb{E}_{(\mathbf{x}, y) \sim \mathcal{p}} (\sigma(\mathbf{w} \cdot \mathbf{x}) - y)^2 - \nu \chi^2(\mathcal{p}, \mathcal{p}_0)$. Our algorithm follows a primal-dual framework and is designed by directly bounding the risk with respect to the original, nonconvex $L_2^2$ loss. From an optimization standpoint, our work opens new avenues for the design of primal-dual algorithms under structured nonconvexity.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to robustly learn a single neuron in the presence of adversarial distribution shift and label noise?** Specifically, the paper focuses on how to find a "best - fit" function when the data distribution changes and the labels may be subject to arbitrary perturbations. ### Problem Background 1. **The learning problem of a single neuron**: - Given labeled samples $(x_i, y_i)$ drawn from the reference distribution $p_0$, the goal is to recover a parameter vector $w^*$ such that it minimizes the squared loss: \[ w^*=\arg\min_{w\in\mathbb{R}^d:\|w\|_2\leq W}\Lambda_{\sigma, p_0}(w) \] where \[ \Lambda_{\sigma, p_0}(w):=\mathbb{E}_{(x,y)\sim p_0}[(\sigma(w\cdot x) - y)^2] \] Here, $\sigma$ is a known nonlinear activation function (for example, the ReLU activation function $\sigma(t)=\max(0, t)$). 2. **Adversarial distribution shift and label noise**: - In real - world scenarios, the data distribution may change (i.e., distribution shift), and at the same time, the labels may be subject to noise interference. These problems make traditional learning methods inapplicable. - The paper specifically focuses on the problem of minimizing the squared loss under the distribution $p$ close to the reference distribution $p_0$ in the worst - case scenario. ### Main Contributions of the Paper 1. **Algorithm Design**: - Proposed a computationally efficient algorithm that can recover an approximately optimal parameter vector $\hat{w}$ in the presence of adversarial distribution shift and label noise, such that its squared loss is close to the squared loss of the theoretically optimal solution $w^*$: \[ \mathbb{E}_{p^*}[(\sigma(\hat{w}\cdot x)-y)^2]\leq C\mathbb{E}_{p^*}[(\sigma(w^*\cdot x)-y)^2]+\epsilon \] where $C > 1$ is a dimension - independent constant, and $(w^*, p^*)$ is the solution that minimizes the min - max risk. 2. **Theoretical Analysis**: - The paper provides a new solution to the optimization problem by directly estimating the bounds of the original non - convex $L_2^2$ loss through the introduction of a dual framework. - The paper also proves that under appropriate assumptions, the algorithm can converge to an approximately optimal solution in polynomial time and gives the specific convergence rate and error bounds. ### Key Challenges 1. **Non - convexity**: - Even the learning problem under the simplest ReLU activation function is non - convex, which poses a great challenge to optimization. 2. **Distribution Shift**: - The change in the data distribution makes traditional learning methods inapplicable, and new robust learning algorithms need to be designed to deal with this problem. 3. **Label Noise**: - The existence of adversarial label noise makes the problem more complex, and it is necessary to consider how to find the optimal solution in such an environment. ### Solutions The paper successfully addresses the above challenges by introducing the dual framework and the local error bound method. Specifically: - **Dual Framework**: By constructing dual variables, the original problem is transformed into a more tractable form. - **Local Error Bound**: Use the local error bound to quantify the growth of the loss function and guide the algorithm to gradually approach the optimal solution. In summary, the paper proposes an effective method for robustly learning a single neuron in the presence of adversarial distribution shift and label noise, and provides new ideas and tools for research in related fields.

Learning a Single Neuron Robustly to Distributional Shifts and Adversarial Label Noise

Low Rank Matrix Recovery with Adversarial Sparse Noise

Local Competition and Uncertainty for Adversarial Robustness in Deep Learning

Robust Distribution Learning with Local and Global Adversarial Corruptions

Tolerant Algorithms for Learning with Arbitrary Covariate Shift

Stable Adversarial Learning under Distributional Shifts

Coping with Label Shift via Distributionally Robust Optimisation

Learning Representations Robust to Group Shifts and Adversarial Examples

Learning Neural Models for Natural Language Processing in the Face of Distributional Shift

Regularization for Adversarial Robust Learning

Testable Learning with Distribution Shift

Local Competition and Stochasticity for Adversarial Robustness in Deep Learning

Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks

Distributionally Robust Learning With Stable Adversarial Training

Learning with Noisy Labels Via Sparse Regularization

Taking a Moment for Distributional Robustness

Efficiently Learning Adversarially Robust Halfspaces with Noise

DC4L: Distribution Shift Recovery via Data-Driven Control for Deep Learning Models

Double Descent and Overfitting under Noisy Inputs and Distribution Shift for Linear Denoisers

The Power of Localization for Efficiently Learning Linear Separators with Noise

On the Vulnerability of Fairness Constrained Learning to Malicious Noise