Abstract:The uncertainty principle may be considered as giving rise to the notion of incompatibility of observables. A pack of quantum measurements that cannot be measured simultaneously is said to form a set of incompatible measurements. Every set of incompatible measurements has an advantage over the compatible ones in a quantum state discrimination task where one prepares a state from an ensemble and sends it to another party, and the latter tries to detect the state using available measurements. Comparison between global and local quantum state discriminations is known to lead to a phenomenon of "nonlocality". In this work, we seal a connection between the domains of local quantum state discrimination and incompatible quantum measurements. We consider the local quantum state discrimination task where a sender prepares a bipartite state and sends the subsystems to two receivers. The receivers try to detect the sent state using locally incompatible measurements. We analyze the ratio of the probability of successfully guessing the state using incompatible measurements and the maximum probability of successfully guessing the state using compatible measurements. We find that this ratio is upper bounded by a simple function of robustnesses of incompatibilities of the local measurements. Interestingly, corresponding to every pair of sets of incompatible measurements, there exists at least one local state discrimination task where this bound can be achieved. We argue that the optimal local quantum state discrimination task does not present any "nonlocality", where the term is used in the sense of a difference between the ratios, of probabilities of successful detection via incompatible and compatible measurements, in global and local state discriminations. The results can be generalized to the regime of multipartite local quantum state distinguishing tasks.

Measurement incompatibility under loss

Compatibility of projective measurements subject to white noise and loss

Quantum measurement incompatibility in subspaces

Measurement incompatibility and quantum advantage in communication

Distributed quantum incompatibility

Device-independent quantification of measurement incompatibility

Characterizing and quantifying the incompatibility of quantum instruments

Incompatibility of quantum instruments

The complexity of compatible measurements

Testing incompatibility of quantum devices with few states

Certifying measurement incompatibility in prepare-and-measure and Bell scenarios

Quantum Incompatibility Witnesses

Measurement incompatibility at remote entangled parties is insufficient for Bell nonlocality in two-input and two-output setting

Joint-measurability and quantum communication with untrusted devices

Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality

Incompatibility of local measurements provide advantage in local quantum state discrimination

Quantifying incompatibility beyond entropic uncertainty

Measurement incompatibility cannot be stochastically distilled

On compatibility of binary qubit measurements

A Note on Hierarchy of Quantum Measurement Incompatibilities