Deriving Analytical Solutions Using Symbolic Matrix Structural Analysis: Part 1 -- Continuous Beams

Vagelis Plevris,Afaq Ahmad
2024-11-06
Abstract:This study investigates the use of symbolic computation in Matrix Structural Analysis (MSA) for continuous beams, leveraging the MATLAB Symbolic Math Toolbox. By employing symbolic MSA, analytical expressions for displacements, support reactions, and internal forces are derived, offering deeper insights into structural behavior. This approach facilitates efficient and scalable sensitivity analysis, where partial derivatives of outputs concerning input parameters can be directly computed, enhancing design exploration. The development includes an open-source MATLAB program, hosted on GitHub, enabling symbolic analysis of continuous beams subjected to point and uniform loads. This approach is invaluable for both engineering practice and pedagogy, enriching the understanding of structural mechanics and aiding in education by illustrating clear parameter relationships. The program supports deriving influence lines and identifying maximum response values.
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science,Numerical Analysis
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to derive analytical solutions for continuous beams through Symbolic Matrix Structural Analysis (MSA). Specifically, the author uses MATLAB's Symbolic Math Toolbox to derive analytical expressions for the displacement, support reactions, and internal forces of continuous beams under point loads and uniformly distributed loads by means of symbolic calculation methods. ### Main problems and solutions 1. **Limitations of traditional numerical methods**: - Traditional Finite Element Method (FEM) and Matrix Structural Analysis (MSA) mainly rely on numerical calculations. Although they can provide detailed results for specific problems, they are limited in flexibility and generality. - Numerical solutions are usually applicable to specific input parameters (such as material properties, geometric shapes, and external loads). Modifying these parameters requires recalculating the entire system, which is time - consuming and computationally intensive. - Numerical results often obscure the relationships between key parameters, making it difficult to deeply understand the structural behavior. 2. **Advantages of symbolic calculation**: - Symbolic calculation allows operating and solving mathematical expressions in an exact algebraic form, rather than only providing specific numerical results. - Through symbolic MSA, analytical expressions for displacement, support reactions, and internal forces can be derived, thus enabling a deeper understanding of the structural behavior. - Symbolic solutions can flexibly adapt to different load conditions, boundary constraints, or material properties without the need for repeated calculations. - Symbolic expressions can directly calculate the partial derivatives of the output with respect to the input parameters, facilitating sensitivity analysis and design optimization. 3. **Educational and practical values**: - Symbolic solutions are helpful for teaching, enabling students and engineers to better understand the basic principles of mechanics and structural behavior. - The symbolic form clearly shows how physical parameters (such as elastic modulus E and section moment of inertia I) affect displacement, stress, and strain. - It provides an intuitive framework that allows students to experiment with different parameter values and predict their impact on the structural behavior. ### Specific contributions of the paper - **Developed an open - source MATLAB program**: This program can accurately and efficiently derive analytical solutions for any continuous beam configuration, providing symbolic expressions for displacement, support reactions, and internal forces. - **Supports multiple functions**: - Closed - form solutions for any output quantity (such as support reactions). - Output quantity functions (such as bending moment M(x)) at specific points along the beam and their maximum values (such as Mmax). - Analytical expressions for the influence lines of specific outputs. - Sensitivity analysis of any output quantity with respect to input parameters. - **Provides rich examples**: The application of the program is demonstrated through five numerical examples, covering continuous beam problems of different complexity levels. ### Conclusion By introducing the symbolic calculation method, this paper overcomes the lack of flexibility and generality in traditional numerical methods and provides a more efficient and flexible analytical solution method for the structural analysis of continuous beams. This not only enhances the design exploration ability in engineering practice but also provides a valuable tool for the teaching of structural mechanics.