Abstract:Preference alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly improved their ability to adhere to human instructions and intentions. However, existing direct alignment algorithms primarily focus on relative preferences and often overlook the qualitative aspects of responses. Striving to maximize the implicit reward gap between the chosen and the slightly inferior rejected responses can cause overfitting and unnecessary unlearning of the high-quality rejected responses. The unawareness of the reward scores also drives the LLM to indiscriminately favor the low-quality chosen responses and fail to generalize to responses with the highest rewards, which are sparse in data. To overcome these shortcomings, our study introduces reward-conditioned LLM policies that discern and learn from the entire spectrum of response quality within the dataset, helping extrapolate to more optimal regions. We propose an effective yet simple data relabeling method that conditions the preference pairs on quality scores to construct a reward-augmented dataset. This dataset is easily integrated with existing direct alignment algorithms and is applicable to any preference dataset. The experimental results across instruction-following benchmarks including AlpacaEval, MT-Bench, and Arena-Hard-Auto demonstrate that our approach consistently boosts the performance of DPO by a considerable margin across diverse models. Additionally, our method improves the average accuracy on various academic benchmarks. When applying our method to on-policy data, the resulting DPO model achieves SOTA results on AlpacaEval. Through ablation studies, we demonstrate that our method not only maximizes the utility of preference data but also mitigates the issue of unlearning, demonstrating its broad effectiveness beyond mere dataset expansion. Our code is available at <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/shenao-zhang/reward-augmented-preference" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>.

Dr. SoW: Density Ratio of Strong-over-weak LLMs for Reducing the Cost of Human Annotation in Preference Tuning

Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs

Self-Boosting Large Language Models with Synthetic Preference Data

Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness

Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards

HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferences

From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning

Everyone Deserves A Reward: Learning Customized Human Preferences

Dissecting Human and LLM Preferences

Pedagogical Alignment of Large Language Models

Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMs

MallowsPO: Fine-Tune Your LLM with Preference Dispersions

T-REG: Preference Optimization with Token-Level Reward Regularization

Improving Data Efficiency via Curating LLM-Driven Rating Systems

Elephant in the Room: Unveiling the Impact of Reward Model Quality in Alignment

Aligning Large Language Models with Self-generated Preference Data

ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuning

PURE: Aligning LLM Via Pluggable Query Reformulation for Enhanced Helpfulness

Beyond the Binary: Capturing Diverse Preferences With Reward Regularization

OwLore: Outlier-weighed Layerwise Sampled Low-Rank Projection for Memory-Efficient LLM Fine-tuning

CalibraEval: Calibrating Prediction Distribution to Mitigate Selection Bias in LLMs-as-Judges