Abstract:The rise of large language models (LLMs) has created a significant disparity: industrial research labs with their computational resources, expert teams, and advanced infrastructures, can effectively fine-tune LLMs, while individual developers and small organizations face barriers due to limited resources. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap by presenting a comprehensive study on supervised fine-tuning of LLMs using instruction-tuning datasets spanning diverse knowledge domains and skills. We focus on small-sized LLMs (3B to 7B parameters) for their cost-efficiency and accessibility. We explore various training configurations and strategies across four open-source pre-trained models. We provide detailed documentation of these configurations, revealing findings that challenge several common training practices, including hyperparameter recommendations from TULU and phased training recommended by Orca. Key insights from our work include: (i) larger batch sizes paired with lower learning rates lead to improved model performance on benchmarks such as MMLU, MTBench, and Open LLM Leaderboard; (ii) early-stage training dynamics, such as lower gradient norms and higher loss values, are strong indicators of better final model performance, enabling early termination of sub-optimal runs and significant computational savings; (iii) through a thorough exploration of hyperparameters like warmup steps and learning rate schedules, we provide guidance for practitioners and find that certain simplifications do not compromise performance; and (iv) we observed no significant difference in performance between phased and stacked training strategies, but stacked training is simpler and more sample efficient. With these findings holding robustly across datasets and models, we hope this study serves as a guide for practitioners fine-tuning small LLMs and promotes a more inclusive environment for LLM research.

From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning

Maybe Only 0.5 Training Data Instruction Tuning

Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuning

Self-play with Execution Feedback: Improving Instruction-following Capabilities of Large Language Models

SelectLLM: Can LLMs Select Important Instructions to Annotate?

Rethinking the Instruction Quality: LIFT is What You Need

Instruction Mining: Instruction Data Selection for Tuning Large Language Models

Boosting LLM via Learning from Data Iteratively and Selectively

LLM2LLM: Boosting LLMs with Novel Iterative Data Enhancement

CoachLM: Automatic Instruction Revisions Improve the Data Quality in LLM Instruction Tuning

DELIA: Diversity-Enhanced Learning for Instruction Adaptation in Large Language Models

Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Models

Unveiling the Secret Recipe: A Guide For Supervised Fine-Tuning Small LLMs

A Survey on Data Selection for LLM Instruction Tuning

Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuning

CommonIT: Commonality-Aware Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models via Data Partitions

IterSelectTune: An Iterative Training Framework for Efficient Instruction-Tuning Data Selection

SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning

LLMs-as-Instructors: Learning from Errors Toward Automating Model Improvement

Maybe Only 0.5% Data is Needed: A Preliminary Exploration of Low Training Data Instruction Tuning

Balancing Cost and Effectiveness of Synthetic Data Generation Strategies for LLMs