Abstract:Modern computing systems heavily rely on hardware as the root of trust. However, their increasing complexity has given rise to security-critical vulnerabilities that cross-layer at-tacks can exploit. Traditional hardware vulnerability detection methods, such as random regression and formal verification, have limitations. Random regression, while scalable, is slow in exploring hardware, and formal verification techniques are often concerned with manual effort and state explosions. Hardware fuzzing has emerged as an effective approach to exploring and detecting security vulnerabilities in large-scale designs like modern processors. They outperform traditional methods regarding coverage, scalability, and efficiency. However, state-of-the-art fuzzers struggle to achieve comprehensive coverage of intricate hardware designs within a practical timeframe, often falling short of a 70% coverage threshold. We propose a novel ML-based hardware fuzzer, ChatFuzz, to address this challenge. Ourapproach leverages LLMs like ChatGPT to understand processor language, focusing on machine codes and generating assembly code sequences. RL is integrated to guide the input generation process by rewarding the inputs using code coverage metrics. We use the open-source RISCV-based RocketCore processor as our testbed. ChatFuzz achieves condition coverage rate of 75% in just 52 minutes compared to a state-of-the-art fuzzer, which requires a lengthy 30-hour window to reach a similar condition coverage. Furthermore, our fuzzer can attain 80% coverage when provided with a limited pool of 10 simulation instances/licenses within a 130-hour window. During this time, it conducted a total of 199K test cases, of which 6K produced discrepancies with the processor's golden model. Our analysis identified more than 10 unique mismatches, including two new bugs in the RocketCore and discrepancies from the RISC-V ISA Simulator.

Fuzzerfly Effect: Hardware Fuzzing for Memory Safety

MorFuzz: Fuzzing Processor Via Runtime Instruction Morphing Enhanced Synchronizable Co-simulation.

HyPFuzz: Formal-Assisted Processor Fuzzing

Beyond Random Inputs: A Novel ML-Based Hardware Fuzzing

EM-Fuzz: Augmented Firmware Fuzzing Via Memory Checking

Fuzzm: Finding Memory Bugs through Binary-Only Instrumentation and Fuzzing of WebAssembly

FuzzInMem: Fuzzing Programs Via In-memory Structures

The Emergence of Hardware Fuzzing: A Critical Review of its Significance

The Fuzz Odyssey: A Survey on Hardware Fuzzing Frameworks for Hardware Design Verification

ProcessorFuzz: Guiding Processor Fuzzing using Control and Status Registers

TheHuzz: Instruction Fuzzing of Processors Using Golden-Reference Models for Finding Software-Exploitable Vulnerabilities

Physical Memory Attacks and a Memory Safe Management System for Memory Defense

TaPaFuzz: Hardware-accelerated RISC-V bare-metal firmware fuzzing using rapid job launches

MTSan: A Feasible and Practical Memory Sanitizer for Fuzzing COTS Binaries

When a Patch is Not Enough - HardFails: Software-Exploitable Hardware Bugs

PSOFuzz: Fuzzing Processors with Particle Swarm Optimization

Physical Devices-Agnostic Hybrid Fuzzing of IoT Firmware

MemLock

Program Repair by Fuzzing over Patch and Input Space

Fuzzing Error Handling Code in Device Drivers Based on Software Fault Injection

Identifying exploitable memory objects for out‐of‐bound write vulnerabilities