Abstract:Quantum annealing (QA) is a method for solving combinatorial optimization problems. We can estimate the computational time for QA using the adiabatic condition. The adiabatic condition consists of two parts: an energy gap and a transition matrix. Most past studies have focused on the relationship between the energy gap and computational time. The success probability of QA is considered to decrease exponentially owing to the exponentially decreasing energy gap at the first-order phase-transition point. In this study, through a detailed analysis of the relationship between the energy gap, transition matrix, and computational cost during QA, we propose a general method for constructing counterintuitive models wherein QA with a constant annealing time fails despite a constant energy gap, based on polynomial energy. We assume that the energy of the total Hamiltonian is at most $\Theta(L)$, where $L$ is the number of qubits. In our formalism, we choose a known model that exhibits an exponentially small energy gap during QA, and modify the model by adding a specific penalty term to the Hamiltonian. In the modified model, the transition matrix in the adiabatic condition becomes exponentially large as the number of qubits increases, while the energy gap remains constant. Moreover, we achieve a quadratic speedup, for which the upper bound for improvement in the adiabatic condition is determined by the polynomial energy. As examples, we consider the adiabatic Grover search and the $p$-spin model. In these cases, with the addition of the penalty term, although the success probability of QA on the modified models becomes exponentially small despite a constant energy gap; we can achieve a success probability considerably higher than that of conventional QA. Moreover, we numerically show the scaling of the computational cost is quadratically improved compared to the conventional QA.

Advantages of fixing spins in quantum annealing

Scaling Advantage in Approximate Optimization with Quantum Annealing

Hybrid Quantum Annealing via Molecular Dynamics

Quantum annealing with manufactured spins

Parameters Fixing Strategy for Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Study of Optimization Problems by Quantum Annealing

Improving quantum annealing by engineering the coupling to the environment

Seeking Quantum Speedup Through Spin Glasses: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Greedy parameter optimization for diabatic quantum annealing

Larger Sparse Quadratic Assignment Problem Optimization Using Quantum Annealing and a Bit-Flip Heuristic Algorithm

Optimizing the Optimizer: Decomposition Techniques for Quantum Annealing

Quantum annealing showing an exponentially small success probability despite a constant energy gap with polynomial energy

Quantum Annealing for Constrained Optimization

Quantum combinatorial optimization beyond the variational paradigm: simple schedules for hard problems

Hybrid Optimization Method Using Simulated-Annealing-Based Ising Machine and Quantum Annealer

Experimental quantum annealing: case study involving the graph isomorphism problem

Optimizing the spin reversal transform on the D-Wave 2000Q

Optimization by quantum annealing: lessons from hard satisfiability problems

Stochastic Simulated Quantum Annealing for Fast Solution of Combinatorial Optimization Problems

Multivariable Optimization: Quantum Annealing & Computation

A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Paradigm to Mitigate Embedding Costs in Quantum Annealing