Abstract:Quantitative analysis of cardiac motion is crucial for assessing cardiac function. This analysis typically uses imaging modalities such as MRI and Echocardiograms that capture detailed image sequences throughout the heartbeat cycle. Previous methods predominantly focused on the analysis of image pairs lacking consideration of the motion dynamics and spatial variability. Consequently, these methods often overlook the long-term relationships and regional motion characteristic of cardiac. To overcome these limitations, we introduce the \textbf{GPTrack}, a novel unsupervised framework crafted to fully explore the temporal and spatial dynamics of cardiac motion. The GPTrack enhances motion tracking by employing the sequential Gaussian Process in the latent space and encoding statistics by spatial information at each time stamp, which robustly promotes temporal consistency and spatial variability of cardiac dynamics. Also, we innovatively aggregate sequential information in a bidirectional recursive manner, mimicking the behavior of diffeomorphic registration to better capture consistent long-term relationships of motions across cardiac regions such as the ventricles and atria. Our GPTrack significantly improves the precision of motion tracking in both 3D and 4D medical images while maintaining computational efficiency. The code is available at: <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/xmed-lab/GPTrack" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve several key problems in cardiac motion tracking:
1. **Lack of consideration for motion dynamics and spatial variation**: Previous methods mainly focused on the analysis of image pairs, ignoring the temporal dynamics and spatial variability of cardiac motion. This causes these methods to often overlook the long - term relationships and regional characteristics of cardiac motion.
2. **Insufficient topology preservation and temporal consistency**: Traditional cardiac motion tracking methods such as B - spline, Demons algorithm and optical - flow - based methods, due to the lack of topology - preserving constraints and temporal consistency, lead to significant challenges in motion tracking.
3. **Computational efficiency and noise sensitivity**: Although traditional optimization - based diffeomorphic registration methods can maintain the topological structure, they have high computational complexity and are sensitive to noise, which limits their application in efficient cardiac motion tracking.
4. **Insufficient handling of long - term temporal relationships**: Although existing deep - learning methods can better model the dynamic continuity of cardiac motion, there is still room for improvement in handling long - term temporal relationships in videos.
To solve these problems, the author proposes a new framework named GPTrack. The main contributions of this framework are as follows:
- **Introduction of Gaussian Process (GP)**: By using sequential Gaussian process in the latent space to encode statistical information, the temporal consistency and spatial variability of cardiac motion are enhanced.
- **Bidirectional recursive aggregation of information**: Innovatively adopt a bidirectional recursive method to aggregate sequence information, simulate the behavior of diffeomorphic registration, and better capture the long - term relationships between different regions of the heart (such as ventricles and atria).
- **Improve tracking accuracy**: GPTrack significantly improves the accuracy of motion tracking in 3D and 4D medical images while maintaining computational efficiency.
### Formula Representation
The formulas involved in the paper include the parameterization of diffeomorphic mapping and its discretization, the covariance function of Gaussian process, and the update criterion of Kalman filter, etc. The following are the Markdown - format representations of some formulas:
1. **Parameterization of diffeomorphic mapping**:
\[
\frac{d\phi_t}{dt} = v_t(\phi_t) := v_t\circ\phi_t \Leftrightarrow \phi_t=\phi_0 + \int_0^t v_s(\phi_s)ds, \quad s\in[0, 1]
\]
2. **Covariance function of Matérn kernel**:
\[
\kappa(x_t, x_{t - 1})=\sigma^2\frac{1-\nu}{\Gamma(\nu)}\left(\sqrt{2\nu\frac{D(x_t, x_{t - 1})}{l}}\right)^\nu K_\nu\left(\sqrt{2\nu\frac{D(x_t, x_{t - 1})}{l}}\right)
\]
where $\nu, \sigma, l>0$ are smoothness, amplitude and length - scale parameters, $K_\nu$ is the modified Bessel function, and $D(\cdot, \cdot)$ represents the distance measure between two consecutive motion - field features.
3. **State update of Kalman filter**:
\[
\mu_t\leftarrow\Phi_t\mu_{t - 1}, \quad \Sigma_t\leftarrow\Phi_t\Sigma_{t - 1}\Phi_t^T+\Sigma_0-\Phi_t\Sigma_0\Phi_t^T
\]
\[
\mu_t\leftarrow\mu_t + k_t(f_t - h^T\mu_t), \quad \Sigma_t\leftarrow\Sigma_t - k_t h^T\mu_t
\]
where $k_t:=\Sigma_t h/(h^T\Sigma_t h+\sigma^2)$ is at time