Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>Cardiac motion tracking enables quantitative evaluation of myocardial strain, which is clinically interesting in cardiovascular disease research. However, motion tracking is difficult to perform manually. In this paper, we aim to develop and compare two fully automated motion tracking methods for the steady state free precession (SSFP) cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and explore their use in real clinical scenario with different patient groups.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>We proposed two automated cardiac motion tracking method: (1) a traditional registration‐based method, named Full Cardiac Cycle Registration, which simultaneously tracks all cine frames within a full cardiac cycle by joint registration of all frames; and (2) a modern convolutional neural network (CNN)‐based method, named Groupwise MotionNet, which enhances the temporal coherence by fusing motion along a continuous time scale. Both methods were evaluated on the healthy volunteer data from the MICCAI 2011 STACOM Challenge, as well as on patient data including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and myocardial infarction (MI).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>The Full Cardiac Cycle Registration method achieved an average end‐point‐error 2.89 ± 1.57 mm for cardiac motion tracking, with computation time of around 9 minutes per short‐axis cine MRI (size 128×128, 30 cardiac phases). In comparison, the Groupwise MotionNet achieved an average end‐point‐error of 0.94±1.59 mm, taking less than 1 second for a full cardiac phases. Further experiments showed that registration method had stable performance, independent of patient cohort and MRI machine, while the CNN‐based method relied on the training data to deliver consistently accurate results.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>Both registration‐based and CNN‐based method can track the cardiac motion from SSFP cine MRI in a fully automated manner, while taking temporal coherence into account. The registration method is generic, robust, but relatively slow; the CNN‐based method trained with heterogeneous data was able to achieve high tracking accuracy with real‐time performance.</p></section>

Temporally coherent cardiac motion tracking from cine MRI: Traditional registration method and modern CNN method

A Relative Motion Model for Myocardial Infarction Detection

Spatiotemporal Strategies for Joint Segmentation and Motion Tracking from Cardiac Image Sequences

Tracking Anything in Heart All at Once

A Bidirectional Registration Neural Network for Cardiac Motion Tracking Using Cine MRI Images

Feature Tracking Cardiac Magnetic Resonance via Deep Learning and Spline Optimization

Continuous 3D Myocardial Motion Tracking via Echocardiography

Simultaneous segmentation and motion recovery in 3d cardiac image analysis

A Comprehensive Cardiac Motion Estimation Framework Using Both Untagged and 3-D Tagged MR Images Based on Nonrigid Registration

Spatio-temporal Active Region Model for Simultaneous Segmentation and Motion Estimation of the Whole Heart

Left ventricular myocardial motion tracking in cardiac cine magnetic resonance images based on a biomechanical model

Automatic cardiac motion tracking using both untagged and 3d tagged MR images

Cardiac Motion Analysis Using Nonlinear Biomechanical Constraints

Cardiac Motion Scoring Based on CNN with Attention Mechanism

Direct Delineation of Myocardial Infarction Without Contrast Agents Using a Joint Motion Feature Learning Architecture

Cardiac Motion Scoring with Segment- and Subject-level Non-Local Modeling

MulViMotion: Shape-aware 3D Myocardial Motion Tracking from Multi-View Cardiac MRI

Estimation of cardiac motion in cine-MRI sequences by correlation transform optical flow of monogenic features distance.

Improving coronary artery imaging in single source CT with cardiac motion correction using attention and spatial transformer based neural networks

ECG‐free cine MRI with data‐driven clustering of cardiac motion for quantification of ventricular function

Motion Tracking of Left Ventricle and Coronaries in 4D CTA.