Abstract:Increasing computational power and improving deep learning methods have made computer vision technologies pervasively common in urban environments. Their applications in policing, traffic management, and documenting public spaces are increasingly common (Ridgeway 2018, Coifman et al. 1998, Sun et al. 2020). Despite the often-discussed biases in the algorithms' training and unequally borne benefits (Khosla et al. 2012), almost all applications similarly reduce urban experiences to simplistic, reductive, and mechanistic measures. There is a lack of context, depth, and specificity in these practices that enables semantic knowledge or analysis within urban contexts, especially within the context of using and occupying urban space. This paper will critique existing uses of artificial intelligence and computer vision in urban practices to propose a new framework for understanding people, action, and public space. This paper revisits Geertz's (1973) use of thick descriptions in generating interpretive theories of culture and activity and uses this lens to establish a framework to approach evaluating the varied uses of computer vision technologies that weigh meaning. By discussing cases of implemented examples of urban computer vision—from LinkNYC and Numina's urban measurements to the Detroit Police's use of DataWorks Plus's facial recognition technology—it proposes a framework for evaluating the thickness of the algorithm's conclusions against the computational method's complexity required to produce that outcome. Further, we discuss how the framework's positioning may differ (and conflict) between different users of the technology, from engineer to urban planner and policymaker, to citizen. This paper also discusses how the current use and training of deep learning algorithms and how this process limits semantic learning and proposes three potential methodologies toward gaining a more contextually specific, urban-semantic, description of urban space relevant to urbanists. This paper contributes to the critical conversations regarding the proliferation of artificial intelligence by challenging the current applications of these technologies in the urban environment by highlighting their failures within this context while also proposing an evolution of these algorithms that may ultimately make them sensitive and useful within this spatial and cultural milieu.

Making Urban Art Accessible: Current Art Access Techniques, Design Considerations, and the Role of AI

ARtivism: AR-Enabled Accessible Public Art and Advocacy

Understanding Visual Arts Experiences of Blind People

Exploring Use and Perceptions of Generative AI Art Tools by Blind Artists

Impact of using Artificial Intelligence in visual art performance: Artificial Intelligence on the Design Industry

Investigating AI's Role in Enhancing Multi-Sensory Experiences in Public Spaces

Realization of Urban Perception Art: Painting Expressions of Internet of Things Technologies in Urban Environments

State of the Art: A.I. through the (artificial) artist's eye

AI + Art = Human

Urban public art and interaction design strategy based on digital technology

Testing the Capability of AI Art Tools for Urban Design

Urban-semantic computer vision: a framework for contextual understanding of people in urban spaces

Urban Visual Intelligence: Studying Cities with AI and Street-level Imagery

Urban Visual Intelligence: Studying Cities with Artificial Intelligence and Street-Level Imagery

Aesthetics and Participation in Accessible Art Experiences

Engaging with Public Art: An Exploration of the Design Space

Engaging with Children's Artwork in Mixed Visual-Ability Families

Artists and the Public Spaces of the City

Discussion On The Dynamic Construction Of Urban Public Space With Interactive Public Art

Research on the Application of Computer Digital Information Technology in the Practice of Urban Public Art

Design Considerations for Automatic Musical Soundscapes of Visual Art for People with Blindness or Low Vision