Abstract:Increasing computational power and improving deep learning methods have made computer vision technologies pervasively common in urban environments. Their applications in policing, traffic management, and documenting public spaces are increasingly common (Ridgeway 2018, Coifman et al. 1998, Sun et al. 2020). Despite the often-discussed biases in the algorithms' training and unequally borne benefits (Khosla et al. 2012), almost all applications similarly reduce urban experiences to simplistic, reductive, and mechanistic measures. There is a lack of context, depth, and specificity in these practices that enables semantic knowledge or analysis within urban contexts, especially within the context of using and occupying urban space. This paper will critique existing uses of artificial intelligence and computer vision in urban practices to propose a new framework for understanding people, action, and public space. This paper revisits Geertz's (1973) use of thick descriptions in generating interpretive theories of culture and activity and uses this lens to establish a framework to approach evaluating the varied uses of computer vision technologies that weigh meaning. By discussing cases of implemented examples of urban computer vision—from LinkNYC and Numina's urban measurements to the Detroit Police's use of DataWorks Plus's facial recognition technology—it proposes a framework for evaluating the thickness of the algorithm's conclusions against the computational method's complexity required to produce that outcome. Further, we discuss how the framework's positioning may differ (and conflict) between different users of the technology, from engineer to urban planner and policymaker, to citizen. This paper also discusses how the current use and training of deep learning algorithms and how this process limits semantic learning and proposes three potential methodologies toward gaining a more contextually specific, urban-semantic, description of urban space relevant to urbanists. This paper contributes to the critical conversations regarding the proliferation of artificial intelligence by challenging the current applications of these technologies in the urban environment by highlighting their failures within this context while also proposing an evolution of these algorithms that may ultimately make them sensitive and useful within this spatial and cultural milieu.

Urban Visual Intelligence: Studying Cities with Artificial Intelligence and Street-Level Imagery

Urban Visual Intelligence: Studying Cities with AI and Street-level Imagery

Urban visual intelligence: Uncovering hidden city profiles with street view images

Understanding Urban Perception with Visual Data: A Systematic Review

Why does urban Artificial Intelligence (AI) matter for urban studies? Developing research directions in urban AI research

Urban-semantic computer vision: a framework for contextual understanding of people in urban spaces

The rise of AI urbanism in post-smart cities: A critical commentary on urban artificial intelligence

Artificial Intelligence as Research Methods in Urban Design

AI urbanism: a design framework for governance, program, and platform cognition

Characterizing the perception of urban spaces from visual analytics of street-level imagery

How Will Ai Transform Urban Observing, Sensing, Imaging, and Mapping?

From Vision to Reality: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Different Urban Planning Phases

Testing the Capability of AI Art Tools for Urban Design

Advancing Urban Life: A Systematic Review of Emerging Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in Urban Design and Planning

Computational Urban Design: an Exploration of New Urban Science

A Survey of Urban Visual Analytics: Advances and Future Directions.

A Perceptive Insight into Cities Patterns by Visualizing Urban Economies.

The State of the Art in Visual Analytics for 3D Urban Data

Urban Visual Appeal According to ChatGPT: Contrasting AI and Human Insights

Impact of AI-Based Tools and Urban Big Data Analytics on the Design and Planning of Cities