The Senses Considered as One Perceptual System

Thomas Stoffregen,Bruno Mantel,Benoît G. Bardy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2017.1331116

2024-10-24

Abstract:J. J. Gibson (1966) rejected many classical assumptions about perception but retained 1 that dates back to classical antiquity: the assumption of separate senses. We suggest that Gibson's retention of this assumption compromised his novel concept of perceptual systems. We argue that lawful, 1:1 specification of the animal--environment interaction, which is necessary for perception to be direct, cannot exist in individual forms of ambient energy, such as light, or sound. We argue that specification exists exclusively in emergent, higher order patterns that extend across different forms of ambient energy. These emergent, higher order patterns constitute the global array. If specification exists exclusively in the global array, then direct perception cannot be based upon detection of patterns that are confined to individual forms of ambient energy and, therefore, Gibson's argument for the existence of several distinct perceptual systems cannot be correct. We argue that the senses function as a single, irreducible perceptual system that is sensitive exclusively to patterns in the global array. That is, rather than distinct perceptual systems there exists only 1 perceptual system.

Human-Computer Interaction

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Is the perceptual system composed of multiple independent sensory systems, or should it be regarded as a single, indivisible perceptual system?** Specifically, the authors explored the theory of perceptual systems proposed by J. J. Gibson in his 1966 book "The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems" and pointed out that there are two contradictory views in this book by Gibson:

1. **Aristotelian view**: Each sensory system (such as vision, hearing, etc.) has its specific objects (special objects), and there are some common perceptual objects (common sensibles) that can be perceived by multiple sensory systems.
2. **Non - Aristotelian view**: Some information exists only in the high - order relationships between different sensory systems, and these relationships are emergent and cannot be obtained through a single sensory system.

The authors believe that these two views of Gibson are incompatible, and they advocate rejecting the Aristotelian hypothesis that the perceptual system is composed of multiple independent sensory systems. Instead, they propose that perception should be regarded as a single, indivisible system that is sensitive to high - order patterns in the global array in the environment.

### Main Arguments of the Paper
- **Basis of Direct Perception**: The authors believe that direct perception depends on the structured information in environmental energy from the interaction between animals and the environment. This structured information is formed by physical laws (such as the propagation, reflection, and absorption of energy), so that there is a one - to - one correspondence (specification) between specific aspects in the environment and patterns in environmental energy.

\[
\text{Specification} \implies \text{Lawful, 1:1 relation between patterns in ambient arrays and aspects of the animal - environment interaction}
\]

- **Importance of the Global Array**: The authors emphasize that this one - to - one relationship does not exist in a single form of environmental energy (such as light or sound), but in high - order patterns across different forms of environmental energy. These high - order patterns form the global array. Therefore, direct perception must be based on sensitivity to these high - order patterns.

\[
\text{Global Array} = \text{Emergent higher - order patterns across multiple forms of ambient energy}
\]

- **Necessity of a Single Perceptual System**: Since high - order patterns can only be obtained through the interaction between multiple sensory systems, the authors conclude that the perceptual system should be regarded as a single, indivisible whole rather than multiple independent sensory systems.

### Conclusion
Through a critical analysis of Gibson's theory, the authors proposed a more unified theory of perception, believing that perception is a single, indivisible system that can extract information from the global array in the environment. This theory not only resolves the internal contradictions in Gibson's theory but also provides a new framework for understanding the nature of perception.

---

If you need further information or specific details, please feel free to let us know!