Abstract:We apply a Bayesian agent-based framework inspired by QBism to iterations of two quantum games, the CHSH game and the quantum prisoners' dilemma. In each two-player game, players hold beliefs about an amount of shared entanglement and about the actions or beliefs of the other player. Each takes actions which maximize their expected utility and revises their beliefs with the classical Bayes rule between rounds. We simulate iterated play to see if and how players can learn about the presence of shared entanglement and to explore how their performance, their beliefs, and the game's structure interrelate. In the CHSH game, we find that players can learn that entanglement is present and use this to achieve quantum advantage. We find that they can only do so if they also believe the other player will act correctly to exploit the entanglement. In the case of low or zero entanglement in the CHSH game, the players cannot achieve quantum advantage, even in the case where they believe the entanglement is higher than it is. For the prisoners dilemma, we show that assuming 1-fold rational players (rational players who believe the other player is also rational) reduces the quantum extension [Eisert, Wilkens, and Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3077 (1999)] of the prisoners dilemma to a game with only two strategies, one of which (defect) is dominant for low entanglement, and the other (the quantum strategy Q) is dominant for high entanglement. For intermediate entanglement, neither strategy is dominant. We again show that players can learn entanglement in iterated play. We also show that strong belief in entanglement causes optimal play even in the absence of entanglement -- showing that belief in entanglement is acting as a proxy for the players trusting each other. Our work points to possible future applications in resource detection and quantum algorithm design.

Determining Quantum Correlation through Nash Equilibria in Constant-Sum Games

Characterizing the Nash equilibria of a three-player Bayesian quantum game

Nashian game theory is incompatible with quantum physics

The Role of Correlation in Quantum and Classical Games

Quantum Bayesian Games

Full Characterization of Quantum Correlated Equilibria

Improving social welfare in non-cooperative games with different types of quantum resources

NON-CLASSICAL QUANTUM CORRELATIONS IN QUANTUM GAMES

Quantum advantage beyond entanglement in Bayesian game theory

No-Regret Learning and Equilibrium Computation in Quantum Games

On characterizing quantum correlated equilibria

Continuous-Variable Quantum Games

Towards correlation self-testing of quantum theory in the adaptive Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt game

Studies in the Theory of Quantum Games

Nonlocal correlations: Fair and Unfair Strategies in Bayesian Game

Constructing quantum games from non-factorizable joint probabilities

Quantum Game with Incomplete Information

Nanofriction behavior of cluster-assembled carbon films

Linking quantum discord with Bayesian game theory

Quantum Game Players Can Have Advantage Without Discord