Abstract:Materials discovery lays the foundation for many technological advancements. Predicting and discovering new materials are not simple tasks. We here outline some basic principles of solid-state chemistry, which might help to advance both, and discuss pitfalls and challenges in materials discovery. Using the recent work of Szymanski et al., which reported the autonomous discovery of 43 novel materials, as an example, we discuss problems that can arise in unsupervised materials discovery, and hope that by addressing these, autonomous materials discovery can be brought closer to reality. We discuss all 43 synthetic products and point out four common shortfalls in the analysis. These errors unfortunately lead to the conclusion that no new materials have been discovered in that work. We conclude that there are two important points of improvement that require future work from the community: (i) automated Rietveld analysis of powder x-ray diffraction data is not yet reliable. Future improvement of such, and the development of a reliable artificial intelligence-based tool for Rietveld fitting, would be very helpful, not only to autonomous materials discovery, but also the community in general. (ii) We find that disorder in materials is often neglected in predictions. The predicted compounds investigated herein have all their elemental components located on distinct crystallographic positions, but in reality, elements can share crystallographic sites, resulting in higher symmetry space groups and - very often - known alloys or solid solutions. This error might be related to the difficulty of modeling disorder in a computationally economical way, and needs to be addressed both by computational and experimental material scientists. We find that two-thirds of the claimed successful materials in Szymanski et al are likely to be known, compositionally disordered versions of the predicted, ordered compounds. We highlight important issues in materials discovery, computational chemistry, and autonomous interpretation of x-ray diffraction. We discuss concepts of materials discovery from an experimentalist point of view, which we hope will be helpful for the community to further advance this important new aspect of our field.

Navigation maps of the material space for automated self-driving labs of the future

Global Mapping of Structures and Properties of Crystal Materials

Challenges in high-throughput inorganic material prediction and autonomous synthesis

Mapping inorganic crystal chemical space

An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials

Bayesian Conavigation: Dynamic Designing of the Material Digital Twins via Active Learning

Large-scale machine-learning-assisted exploration of the whole materials space

Materials Cartography: Representing and Mining Material Space Using Structural and Electronic Fingerprints

A machine learning approach to map crystal orientation by optical microscopy

Toward autonomous design and synthesis of novel inorganic materials.

Crystallography companion agent for high-throughput materials discovery

Unleashing the power of novel conditional generative approaches for new materials discovery

Artificial Intelligence Driving Materials Discovery? Perspective on the Article: Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery

On-the-fly Closed-loop Autonomous Materials Discovery via Bayesian Active Learning

Predicting Synthesizability using Machine Learning on Databases of Existing Inorganic Materials

Bayesian Co-navigation: Dynamic Designing of the Materials Digital Twins via Active Learning

Theory-Guided Discovery of Novel Materials

On-the-fly closed-loop materials discovery via Bayesian active learning

Universal self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of materials and molecules

Rapid Discovery of Stable Materials by Coordinate-free Coarse Graining