Abstract:The lack of efficient discovery tools for advanced functional materials remains a major bottleneck to enabling advances in the next-generation energy, health, and sustainability technologies. One main factor contributing to this inefficiency is the large combinatorial space of materials (with respect to material compositions and processing conditions) that is typically redolent of such materials-centric applications. Searches of this large combinatorial space are often influenced by expert knowledge and clustered close to material configurations that are known to perform well, thus ignoring potentially high-performing candidates in unanticipated regions of the composition-space or processing protocol. Moreover, experimental characterization or first principles quantum mechanical calculations of all possible material candidates can be prohibitively expensive, making exhaustive approaches to determine the best candidates infeasible. As a result, there remains a need for the development of computational algorithms that can efficiently search a large parameter space for a given material application. Here, we introduce PAL 2.0, a method that combines a physics-based surrogate model with Bayesian optimization. The key contributing factor of our proposed framework is the ability to create a physics-based hypothesis using XGBoost and Neural Networks. This hypothesis provides a physics-based "prior" (or initial beliefs) to a Gaussian process model, which is then used to perform a search of the material design space. In this paper, we demonstrate the usefulness of our approach on three material test cases: (1) discovery of metal halide perovskites with desired photovoltaic properties, (2) design of metal halide perovskite-solvent pairs that produce the best solution-processed films and (3) design of organic thermoelectric semiconductors. Our results indicate that the novel PAL 2.0 approach outperforms other state-of-the-art methods in its efficiency to search the material design space for the optimal candidate. We also demonstrate the physics-based surrogate models constructed in PAL 2.0 have lower prediction errors for material compositions not seen by the model. To the best of our knowledge, there is no competing algorithm capable of this useful combination for materials discovery, especially those for which data are scarce.

On-the-fly Closed-loop Autonomous Materials Discovery via Bayesian Active Learning

On-the-fly closed-loop materials discovery via Bayesian active learning

An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials

Real-time experiment-theory closed-loop interaction for autonomous materials science

Autonomous synthesis of metastable materials

Benchmarking Active Learning Strategies for Materials Optimization and Discovery

Human-In-the-Loop for Bayesian Autonomous Materials Phase Mapping

Bayesian Co-navigation: Dynamic Designing of the Materials Digital Twins via Active Learning

Bayesian Conavigation: Dynamic Designing of the Material Digital Twins via Active Learning

Targeted materials discovery using Bayesian algorithm execution

Active Learning in Materials Science with Emphasis on Adaptive Sampling Using Uncertainties for Targeted Design

Physics in the Machine: Integrating Physical Knowledge in Autonomous Phase-Mapping

Toward autonomous design and synthesis of novel inorganic materials.

Hypothesis Learning in Automated Experiment: Application to Combinatorial Materials Libraries

A dynamic Bayesian optimized active recommender system for curiosity-driven partially Human-in-the-loop automated experiments

A framework for fully autonomous design of materials via multiobjective optimization and active learning: challenges and next steps

Bias free multiobjective active learning for materials design and discovery

Active learning and molecular dynamics simulations to find high melting temperature alloys

PAL 2.0: A Physics-Driven Bayesian Optimization Framework for Material Discovery