Inadequate contrast ratio of road markings as an indicator for ADAS failure

Novel Certad,Cristina Olaverri-Monreal,Friedrich Wiesinger,Tomasz E. Burghardt
2024-10-17
Abstract:Road markings were reported as critical road safety features, equally needed for both human drivers and for machine vision technologies utilised by advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and in driving automation. Visibility of road markings is achieved because of their colour contrasting with the roadway surface. During recent testing of an open-source camera-based ADAS under several visibility conditions (day, night, rain, glare), significant failures in trajectory planning were recorded and quantified. Consistently, better ADAS reliability under poor visibility conditions was achieved with Type II road markings (i.e. structured markings, facilitating moisture drainage) as compared to Type I road marking (i.e. flat lines). To further understand these failures, analysis of contrast ratio of road markings, which the tested ADAS was detecting for traffic lane recognition, was performed. The highest contrast ratio (greater than 0.5, calculated per Michelson equation) was measured at night in the absence of confounding factors, with statistically significant difference of 0.1 in favour of Type II road markings over Type I. Under daylight conditions, contrast ratio was reduced, with slightly higher values measured with Type I. The presence of rain or wet roads caused the deterioration of the contrast ratio, with Type II road markings exhibiting significantly higher contrast ratio than Type I, even though the values were low (less than 0.1). These findings matched the output of the ADAS related to traffic lane detection and underlined the importance of road marking visibility. Inadequate lane recognition by ADAS was associated with very low contrast ratio of road markings indeed. Importantly, specific minimum contrast ratio value could not be found, which was due to the complexity of ADAS algorithms...
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the impact of insufficient road marking contrast on the performance of Advanced Driver - Assistance Systems (ADAS). Specifically, the research focuses on the impact of different types of road markings (Type I and Type II) on the ADAS lane - recognition ability under different visibility conditions (such as daytime, nighttime, rainy days, glare, etc.). By analyzing the Contrast Ratio (CR) of road markings, the research aims to determine whether low contrast can be an indicator of ADAS failure. ### Main problems: 1. **The relationship between road marking contrast and ADAS performance**: The research attempts to understand how the contrast of road markings affects the performance of ADAS under different environmental conditions, especially the accuracy of lane recognition. 2. **The contrast differences of different types of road markings**: Compare the contrast performance of Type I (flat markings) and Type II (structured markings) under different conditions. 3. **The association between low contrast and ADAS failure**: Explore whether low contrast can be an early - warning indicator of ADAS failure. ### Research background: - **The importance of road markings**: Road markings are a key element in improving road safety and are crucial for both human drivers and ADAS systems. - **The reliability of ADAS**: The reliability of ADAS systems is affected by multiple factors, among which the visibility of road markings is an important factor. - **The deficiencies of existing research**: Although there are many studies on the impact of road markings on driver behavior and ADAS recognition, there is a lack of detailed analysis of the impact of material selection on the visibility of road markings. ### Research methods: - **Testing environment**: Conducted in a closed test site in St. Valentine, Austria, equipped with a rain simulator and a high - intensity light source. - **Testing conditions**: Include multiple visibility conditions such as nighttime, daytime, rainy days, glare, etc. - **Contrast measurement**: Calculate the contrast ratio (CR) of road markings using the Michelson contrast formula as follows: \[ CR_M=\frac{L_m - L_b}{L_m + L_b} \] where \(L_m\) is the luminance of the marking area and \(L_b\) is the luminance of the background road surface. ### Main findings: - **The impact of contrast ratio**: Under nighttime and rainy - day conditions, the contrast ratio of Type II markings is significantly higher than that of Type I markings. - **ADAS performance depends on contrast**: Under poor - visibility conditions, the performance of ADAS strongly depends on the contrast ratio of road markings. - **Low contrast and ADAS failure**: A low contrast ratio may be an important indicator of ADAS failure. ### Conclusions: - **The advantages of Type II markings**: Type II markings can provide better visibility under various conditions, especially at night and on rainy days. - **Improvement of ADAS reliability**: To improve the reliability of ADAS, it is recommended to use Type II markings and perform regular maintenance to maintain their reflective performance. - **Policy recommendations**: Type II markings should be mandatorily used, and the maintenance of road markings should be ensured to improve road safety and the reliability of ADAS systems. Through these research results, the paper provides an important reference for road administrators and ADAS software engineers, which is helpful for improving road safety and the reliability of autonomous driving technology.