Long Li,Weiwen Xu,Jiayan Guo,Ruochen Zhao,Xingxuan Li,Yuqian Yuan,Boqiang Zhang,Yuming Jiang,Yifei Xin,Ronghao Dang,Deli Zhao,Yu Rong,Tian Feng,Lidong Bing
Abstract:Effective research ideation is a critical step for scientific research. However, the exponential increase in scientific literature makes it challenging for researchers to stay current with recent advances and identify meaningful research directions. Recent developments in large language models~(LLMs) suggest a promising avenue for automating the generation of novel research ideas. However, existing methods for idea generation either trivially prompt LLMs or directly expose LLMs to extensive literature without indicating useful information. Inspired by the research process of human researchers, we propose a Chain-of-Ideas~(CoI) agent, an LLM-based agent that organizes relevant literature in a chain structure to effectively mirror the progressive development in a research domain. This organization facilitates LLMs to capture the current advancements in research, thereby enhancing their ideation capabilities. Furthermore, we propose Idea Arena, an evaluation protocol that can comprehensively evaluate idea generation methods from different perspectives, aligning closely with the preferences of human researchers. Experimental results indicate that the CoI agent consistently outperforms other methods and shows comparable quality as humans in research idea generation. Moreover, our CoI agent is budget-friendly, with a minimum cost of \$0.50 to generate a candidate idea and its corresponding experimental design.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve
This paper aims to address the issue of effective idea generation in scientific research. With the exponential growth of scientific literature, it is becoming increasingly difficult for researchers to keep up with the latest developments and identify meaningful research directions. Although large language models (LLMs) show great potential in automatically generating new research ideas, existing idea generation methods either simply prompt LLMs or expose LLMs to a large amount of literature without indicating useful information. This results in generated ideas lacking logical coherence and technical innovation.
To address these issues, the authors propose an agent framework called "Chain-of-Ideas" (CoI). This framework organizes relevant literature into a chain structure that effectively reflects the gradual development of the research field. This approach helps LLMs capture current research progress, thereby enhancing their idea generation capabilities. Additionally, the authors propose an evaluation protocol called "Idea Arena," which comprehensively assesses different aspects of idea generation methods and aligns closely with human researchers' preferences.
### Main Contributions
1. **Proposing the CoI Agent**: By constructing a chain structure of relevant literature, it effectively reflects the gradual development of the research field, enabling LLMs to better understand current research progress.
2. **Proposing the Idea Arena Evaluation Protocol**: This protocol can comprehensively evaluate idea generation methods from multiple perspectives, aligning closely with human researchers' preferences.
3. **Experimental Validation**: Extensive experimental results show that the CoI agent performs excellently in idea generation, comparable to human experts.
### Solution
1. **CoI Construction**: By selecting and organizing relevant literature, a chain structure is formed that reflects the gradual development of the research field.
2. **Idea Generation**: Utilizing the constructed CoI, LLMs predict future research trends and generate ideas through iterative novelty checks and integration.
3. **Experimental Design**: Generate and optimize experimental designs to achieve the final idea.
### Experimental Setup
- **Data Source**: Recent research topics are collected from Hugging Face's Daily Papers, ensuring the topics are sufficiently novel and within the time range after the LLM data cutoff.
- **Baseline Methods**: Compared with various existing methods, including RAG, ResearchAgent, GPT-Researcher, AI-Scientist, etc.
- **Evaluation Method**: Using the Idea Arena evaluation protocol, ELO scores for each method are calculated through a round-robin tournament, comprehensively evaluating from dimensions such as novelty, importance, clarity, feasibility, and expected impact.
### Experimental Results
- **Model Evaluation**: The CoI agent performs excellently in model evaluation, significantly outperforming other automated methods.
- **Human Evaluation**: In human evaluation, the CoI agent performs well in clarity, feasibility, and expected impact, but still lags behind real papers in these aspects.
- **Ablation Study**: Excluding the CoI construction phase has the greatest impact on idea quality, emphasizing the importance of organizing literature based on gradual relationships.
Through these methods and experiments, the paper successfully addresses the issue of effective idea generation in scientific research, providing new tools and methods for future research.