Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) can pass explicit social bias tests but still harbor implicit biases, similar to humans who endorse egalitarian beliefs yet exhibit subtle biases. Measuring such implicit biases can be a challenge: as LLMs become increasingly proprietary, it may not be possible to access their embeddings and apply existing bias measures; furthermore, implicit biases are primarily a concern if they affect the actual decisions that these systems make. We address both challenges by introducing two new measures of bias: LLM Implicit Bias, a prompt-based method for revealing implicit bias; and LLM Decision Bias, a strategy to detect subtle discrimination in decision-making tasks. Both measures are based on psychological research: LLM Implicit Bias adapts the Implicit Association Test, widely used to study the automatic associations between concepts held in human minds; and LLM Decision Bias operationalizes psychological results indicating that relative evaluations between two candidates, not absolute evaluations assessing each independently, are more diagnostic of implicit biases. Using these measures, we found pervasive stereotype biases mirroring those in society in 8 value-aligned models across 4 social categories (race, gender, religion, health) in 21 stereotypes (such as race and criminality, race and weapons, gender and science, age and negativity). Our prompt-based LLM Implicit Bias measure correlates with existing language model embedding-based bias methods, but better predicts downstream behaviors measured by LLM Decision Bias. These new prompt-based measures draw from psychology's long history of research into measuring stereotype biases based on purely observable behavior; they expose nuanced biases in proprietary value-aligned LLMs that appear unbiased according to standard benchmarks.

Assessing Bias in Metric Models for LLM Open-Ended Generation Bias Benchmarks

Evaluating and Mitigating Social Bias for Large Language Models in Open-ended Settings

BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generation

Causally Testing Gender Bias in LLMs: A Case Study on Occupational Bias

Subtle Biases Need Subtler Measures: Dual Metrics for Evaluating Representative and Affinity Bias in Large Language Models

Different Bias Under Different Criteria: Assessing Bias in LLMs with a Fact-Based Approach

Quantifying Bias in Agentic Large Language Models: A Benchmarking Approach

Challenges in Measuring Bias via Open-Ended Language Generation

Measuring Implicit Bias in Explicitly Unbiased Large Language Models

BERTScore is Unfair: on Social Bias in Language Model-Based Metrics for Text Generation

Keeping Up with the Language Models: Systematic Benchmark Extension for Bias Auditing

SAGED: A Holistic Bias-Benchmarking Pipeline for Language Models with Customisable Fairness Calibration

Decoding Biases: Automated Methods and LLM Judges for Gender Bias Detection in Language Models

STOP! Benchmarking Large Language Models with Sensitivity Testing on Offensive Progressions

An Actionable Framework for Assessing Bias and Fairness in Large Language Model Use Cases

Ask LLMs Directly, "What shapes your bias?": Measuring Social Bias in Large Language Models

Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Models

White Men Lead, Black Women Help? Benchmarking Language Agency Social Biases in LLMs

BiasAlert: A Plug-and-play Tool for Social Bias Detection in LLMs

The African Woman is Rhythmic and Soulful: An Investigation of Implicit Biases in LLM Open-ended Text Generation