Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) can pass explicit social bias tests but still harbor implicit biases, similar to humans who endorse egalitarian beliefs yet exhibit subtle biases. Measuring such implicit biases can be a challenge: as LLMs become increasingly proprietary, it may not be possible to access their embeddings and apply existing bias measures; furthermore, implicit biases are primarily a concern if they affect the actual decisions that these systems make. We address both challenges by introducing two new measures of bias: LLM Implicit Bias, a prompt-based method for revealing implicit bias; and LLM Decision Bias, a strategy to detect subtle discrimination in decision-making tasks. Both measures are based on psychological research: LLM Implicit Bias adapts the Implicit Association Test, widely used to study the automatic associations between concepts held in human minds; and LLM Decision Bias operationalizes psychological results indicating that relative evaluations between two candidates, not absolute evaluations assessing each independently, are more diagnostic of implicit biases. Using these measures, we found pervasive stereotype biases mirroring those in society in 8 value-aligned models across 4 social categories (race, gender, religion, health) in 21 stereotypes (such as race and criminality, race and weapons, gender and science, age and negativity). Our prompt-based LLM Implicit Bias measure correlates with existing language model embedding-based bias methods, but better predicts downstream behaviors measured by LLM Decision Bias. These new prompt-based measures draw from psychology's long history of research into measuring stereotype biases based on purely observable behavior; they expose nuanced biases in proprietary value-aligned LLMs that appear unbiased according to standard benchmarks.

Quantifying Bias in Agentic Large Language Models: A Benchmarking Approach

Evaluating and Mitigating Social Bias for Large Language Models in Open-ended Settings

Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMs

White Men Lead, Black Women Help? Benchmarking Language Agency Social Biases in LLMs

Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey

Unveiling and Mitigating Bias in Mental Health Analysis with Large Language Models

Benchmarking Bias in Large Language Models during Role-Playing

An Actionable Framework for Assessing Bias and Fairness in Large Language Model Use Cases

Measuring Implicit Bias in Explicitly Unbiased Large Language Models

How Can We Diagnose and Treat Bias in Large Language Models for Clinical Decision-Making?

Investigating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models: A Large-Scale Study of Over 50 LLMs

Bias Neutralization Framework: Measuring Fairness in Large Language Models with Bias Intelligence Quotient (BiQ)

Bias patterns in the application of LLMs for clinical decision support: A comprehensive study

Evaluating Nuanced Bias in Large Language Model Free Response Answers

Analyzing Social Biases in Japanese Large Language Models

A Comprehensive Survey of Bias in LLMs: Current Landscape and Future Directions

LangBiTe: A Platform for Testing Bias in Large Language Models

Evaluating Gender, Racial, and Age Biases in Large Language Models: A Comparative Analysis of Occupational and Crime Scenarios

Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models