Abstract:Wireless networks are built upon a shared medium that makes it easy for adversaries to launch jamming-style attacks. These attacks can be easily accomplished by an adversary emitting radio frequency signals that do not follow an underlying MAC protocol. Jamming attacks can severely interfere with the normal operation of wireless networks and, consequently, mechanisms are needed that can cope with jamming attacks. In this paper, we examine radio interference attacks from both sides of the issue: first, we study the problem of conducting radio interference attacks on wireless networks, and second we examine the critical issue of diagnosing the presence of jamming attacks. Specifically, we propose four different jamming attack models that can be used by an adversary to disable the operation of a wireless network, and evaluate their effectiveness in terms of how each method affects the ability of a wireless node to send and receive packets. We then discuss different measurements that serve as the basis for detecting a jamming attack, and explore scenarios where each measurement by itself is not enough to reliably classify the presence of a jamming attack. In particular, we observe that signal strength and carrier sensing time are unable to conclusively detect the presence of a jammer. Further, we observe that although by using packet delivery ratio we may differentiate between congested and jammed scenarios, we are nonetheless unable to conclude whether poor link utility is due to jamming or the mobility of nodes. The fact that no single measurement is sufficient for reliably classifying the presence of a jammer is an important observation, and necessitates the development of enhanced detection schemes that can remove ambiguity when detecting a jammer. To address this need, we propose two enhanced detection protocols that employ consistency checking. The first scheme employs signal strength measurements as a reactive consistency check for poor packet delivery ratios, while the second scheme employs location information to serve as the consistency check. Throughout our discussions, we examine the feasibility and effectiveness of jamming attacks and detection schemes using the MICA2 Mote platform.

Timely NextG Communications with Decoy Assistance against Deep Learning-based Jamming

Timeliness in NextG Spectrum Sharing under Jamming Attacks with Deep Learning

Anti-jamming Timing Channels for Wireless Networks

Defending Wireless Networks from Radio Interference Attacks

The Feasibility of Launching and Detecting Jamming Attacks in Wireless Networks.

Reactive Jamming and Attack Mitigation over Cross-Technology Communication Links

An Electronic Jamming Method Based on a Distributed Information Sharing Mechanism

Jamming Sensor Networks: Attack and Defense Strategies

On Adjusting Power to Defend Wireless Networks from Jamming

"Jam Me If You Can'': Defeating Jammer with Deep Dueling Neural Network Architecture and Ambient Backscattering Augmented Communications

Deep Learning for Launching and Mitigating Wireless Jamming Attacks

Adversarial Machine Learning for NextG Covert Communications Using Multiple Antennas

Intelligent Jamming Strategy for Wireless Communications Based on Game Theory

No Time To Demodulate - Fast Physical Layer Verification Of Friendly Jamming

Proactive Eavesdropping via Cognitive Jamming in Fading Channels

Proactive Eavesdropping Via Opportunistic Energy Transfer and Jamming for Wireless-Powered Suspicious Communication

A Covert Jamming Scheme Against an Intelligent Eavesdropper in Cooperative Cognitive Radio Networks

A back‐to‐back coordination‐based learning scheme for deceiving reactive jammers in distributed networks

AntiJam: Efficient Medium Access despite Adaptive and Reactive Jamming

Jamming Aided Covert Communication With Multiple Receivers

Proactive Eavesdropping Via Jamming in UAV-Enabled Relaying Systems with Statistical CSI