Abstract:The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage.

Provable Privacy Attacks on Trained Shallow Neural Networks

The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networks

Devil in Disguise: Breaching Graph Neural Networks Privacy through Infiltration

Theory-Oriented Deep Leakage from Gradients Via Linear Equation Solver.

Exploring the Security Boundary of Data Reconstruction via Neuron Exclusivity Analysis

Privacy Leakage Risk Assessment for Reversible Neural Network

Understanding Reconstruction Attacks with the Neural Tangent Kernel and Dataset Distillation

Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning in the Wild: Membership Inference Attacks against Transfer Learning

Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Neural Network Pruning

Membership reconstruction attack in deep neural networks

Rethinking Privacy Preserving Deep Learning: How to Evaluate and Thwart Privacy Attacks

Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Models

Does Black-box Attribute Inference Attacks on Graph Neural Networks Constitute Privacy Risk?

Reconstruction Attacks on Machine Unlearning: Simple Models are Vulnerable

Regula Sub-rosa: Latent Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks

Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

Training Data Reconstruction: Privacy due to Uncertainty?

Data Reconstruction Attacks and Defenses: A Systematic Evaluation

Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularization

Verification of Neural Networks Local Differential Classification Privacy

Security and Privacy Challenges in Deep Learning Models