How do we Observe Relational Observables?

Emily Adlam
2024-10-08
Abstract:In theories with a diffeomorphism symmetry, such as general relativity and canonical quantum gravity, it is often proposed that the empirical content is encoded in relational observables. But how do relational observables actually make contact with experience? I argue that this question can only be answered by providing a schematization of the observer which is appropriate for the context of a diffeomorphism-invariant theory. I suggest that this may require us to move away from a `passive awareness' conception of consciousness towards a more agential conception, because there is a clear sense in which an embodied agent must experience herself as localised at a time. Finally, I consider what this means for the prospects of using quantum reference frames to address the problem of time, arguing that the way in which quantum reference frames are standardly described does not give us adequate resources to model agency, so some other kind of internal reference frame may be required to fully explain how we observe relational observables in the quantum context.
History and Philosophy of Physics,Quantum Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to relate relational observables to our experiences in theories with diffeomorphism symmetry, such as general relativity and canonical quantum gravity. Specifically: 1. **Formal problem**: In these theories, due to diffeomorphism invariance, traditional local variables are no longer observable. Therefore, a method needs to be found to recover sufficient physical reality structure so that classical and quantum physics can be formulated under appropriate conditions. 2. **Empirical problem**: How to understand how our experiences are related to the observables in these physical theories. In particular, how to explain the role of the observer in these theories and how they experience events at specific points in time. The author points out that these two problems are inter - related and both need to be solved for these theories to be successful. The formal problem focuses on the mathematical and physical foundations of the theory, while the empirical problem involves the physical origin of the observer and how it interacts with the observables in the theory. ### Main points of the paper 1. **The concept of relational observables**: - Relational observables are variables defined through their relationships with other physical quantities. For example, in general relativity, time is no longer an independent parameter but is defined through the correlation between a physical system and a clock. - This approach can solve the "time problem", that is, how to understand the passage of time in quantum gravity. 2. **The role of the observer**: - The author believes that in order to understand how to observe relational observables, a suitable schematic description of the observer for diffeomorphism - invariant theories needs to be provided. - The traditional concept of "passive consciousness" may not be applicable to such theories because an embodied agent must experience its own existence at a specific point in time. Therefore, a more active concept of consciousness needs to be adopted. 3. **Quantum reference frames**: - The author discusses the formalization method of quantum reference frames (QRFs), which is a method of defining relational variables by choosing subsystems as reference frames. - However, the standard QRF description may not be sufficient to fully explain agency, so other types of internal reference frames may be required to explain how we observe relational observables. ### Conclusion The author believes that solving the problem of how to observe relational observables is not only a formal challenge but also a philosophical one. This involves understanding the relationship between consciousness and the physical world and how to explain the observer's experience in diffeomorphism - invariant theories. Ultimately, this may help solve the "time problem" in quantum gravity.