Abstract:We present a study of asteroseismically derived surface gravities, masses, and radii of a sample of red giant stars both with and without confirmed planetary companions using TESS photometric light curves. These red giants were drawn from radial velocity surveys, and their reported properties in the literature rely on more traditional methods using spectroscopy and isochrone fitting. Our asteroseismically derived surface gravities achieved a precision of $\sim$0.01 dex; however, they were on average $\sim$0.1~dex smaller than the literature. The systematic larger gravities of the literature could plausibly present as a systematic overestimation of stellar masses, which would in turn lead to overestimated planetary masses of the companions. We find that the fractional discrepancies between our asteroseismically-determined parameters and those previously found are typically larger for stellar radii ($\sim$10% discrepancy) than for stellar masses ($<5$% discrepancy). However, no evidence of a systematic difference between methods was found for either fundamental parameter. Two stars, HD~100065 and HD~18742, showed significant disagreement with the literature in both mass and radii. We explore the impacts on updated stellar properties on inferred planetary properties and caution that red giant radii may be more poorly constrained than uncertainties suggest.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to conduct asteroseismic measurements of the surface gravity, mass, and radius of red giants through TESS photometric curves, and compare the results with those obtained by traditional methods (such as spectroscopy and isochrone fitting). Specifically, the research objectives include: 1. **Accurately measure the surface gravity, mass, and radius of red giants**: Utilize TESS photometric curves to perform high - precision measurements of the surface gravity, mass, and radius of red giants through asteroseismic methods (such as the measurement of frequency separation $\Delta \nu$ and maximum frequency $\nu_{\text{max}}$). 2. **Evaluate the consistency of different methods**: Compare the parameters obtained by asteroseismic methods with those obtained by traditional methods in the literature, and evaluate the consistency and systematic deviation between the two methods. 3. **Explore the influence of planetary systems**: Study the properties of red giants and their companion star systems, especially whether the estimation of planetary mass is affected by the errors in stellar properties. 4. **Verify the properties of red giants**: Through asteroseismic methods, verify whether the surface gravity, mass, and radius of red giants are systematically overestimated or underestimated by traditional methods. ### Formula explanations In the paper, the following standard asteroseismic scaling relations are used to calculate the surface gravity, mass, and radius of stars: 1. **Surface gravity**: \[ \frac{g}{g_\odot} = \left(\frac{\nu_{\text{max}}}{\nu_{\text{max},\odot}}\right) \left(\frac{T_{\text{eff}}}{T_{\text{eff},\odot}}\right)^{1/2} \] 2. **Mass**: \[ \frac{M}{M_\odot} = \left(\frac{\nu_{\text{max}}}{\nu_{\text{max},\odot}}\right)^3 \left(\frac{\Delta \nu}{\Delta \nu_\odot}\right)^{-4} \left(\frac{T_{\text{eff}}}{T_{\text{eff},\odot}}\right)^{3/2} \] 3. **Radius**: \[ \frac{R}{R_\odot} = \left(\frac{\nu_{\text{max}}}{\nu_{\text{max},\odot}}\right) \left(\frac{\Delta \nu}{\Delta \nu_\odot}\right)^{-2} \left(\frac{T_{\text{eff}}}{T_{\text{eff},\odot}}\right)^{1/2} \] where $\nu_{\text{max}}$ is the maximum frequency, $\Delta \nu$ is the frequency separation, $T_{\text{eff}}$ is the effective temperature, and the subscript $\odot$ represents the values of the Sun. ### Main findings 1. **Systematic deviation of surface gravity**: The surface gravity obtained by asteroseismic methods is on average about 0.1 dex lower than the values in the literature, which may indicate that traditional methods systematically overestimate the surface gravity. 2. **Differences in mass and radius**: For mass, the difference between the values obtained by asteroseismic methods and those in the literature is usually less than 5%, while for radius, the difference is usually about 10%. 3. **Significant differences in specific stars**: Two stars (HD 100065 and HD 18742) have significant differences in mass and radius from the values in the literature. 4. **Influence of planetary mass**: Errors in stellar properties may lead to overestimation or underestimation of planetary mass. ### Conclusion This study provides more accurate measurements of the properties of red giants through asteroseismic methods and points out some potential systematic deviations of traditional methods. These results are helpful.

TESS Asteroseismic Masses and Radii of Red Giants with (and without) Planets

TESS Asteroseismic Masses and Radii of Red Giants with (and without) Planets

Benchmarking the spectroscopic masses of 249 evolved stars using asteroseismology with TESS

Using Asteroseismology to Calibrate the Physical Parameters of Confirmed Exoplanets and Their Evolved Host Stars

Asteroseismic masses of four evolved planet-hosting stars using SONG and TESS: resolving the retired A-star mass controversy

Asteroseismic Modeling of 1,153 Kepler Red Giant Branch Stars: Improved Stellar Parameters with Gravity-Mode Period Spacings and Luminosity Constraints

Testing the asteroseismic estimates of stellar radii with surface brightness-colour relations and Gaia DR3 parallaxes. Red giants and red clump stars

Precise and Accurate Mass and Radius Measurements of Fifteen Galactic Red Giants in Detached Eclipsing Binaries

Investigating Gaia EDR3 parallax systematics using asteroseismology of Cool Giant Stars observed by Kepler, K2, and TESS I. Asteroseismic distances to 12,500 red-giant stars

The Planetary Mass-Radius Relation and its Dependence on Orbital Period as Measured by Transit Timing Variations and Radial Velocities

A Uniform Analysis of 118 Stars with High-Contrast Imaging: Long Period Extrasolar Giant Planets are Rare around Sun-like Stars

Stellar parameters and chemical abundances of 223 evolved stars with and without planets

Red horizontal branch stars: An asteroseismic perspective

The TESS-Keck Survey. XVII. Precise Mass Measurements in a Young, High-multiplicity Transiting Planet System Using Radial Velocities and Transit Timing Variations

Revealing the Fate of Exoplanet Systems: Asteroseismic Identification of Host Star in the Red Clump or Red Giant Branch

Stellar population astrophysics (SPA) with the TNG. Abundance analysis of nearby red giants and red clump stars: combining high resolution spectroscopy and asteroseismology

Retired A Stars: The Effect of Stellar Evolution on the Mass Estimates of Subgiants

Density discrepancy between transit-timing variations and radial velocity: Insights from the host star composition