Abstract:This paper reports estimated stellar parameters of 1,153 Kepler red giant branch stars determined with asteroseismic modeling. We use radial-mode oscillation frequencies, gravity-mode period spacings, Gaia luminosities, and spectroscopic data to characterize these stars. Compared with previous studies, we find that the two additional observed constraints, i.e., the gravity-mode period spacing and luminosity, significantly improve the precision of fundamental stellar parameters. The typical uncertainties are 2.9% for the mass, 11% for the age, 1.0% for the radius, 0.0039 dex for the surface gravity, and 0.5\% for the helium core mass, making this the best-characterized large sample of red-giant stars available to date. With better characterizations for these red giants, we recalibrate the seismic scaling relations and study the surface term on the red-giant branch. We confirm that the surface term depends on the surface gravity and effective temperature, but there is no significant correlation with metallicity.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to improve the accuracy of estimating the basic parameters of Kepler Red Giant Branch (RGB) stars. Specifically, the authors used data of 1,153 Kepler red giants and introduced the gravity - mode period spacing (∆Π) and Gaia luminosity (L) as additional observational constraints to improve the estimation of basic parameters such as the mass, age, radius, surface gravity, and helium core mass of these stars. Compared with previous studies, this method significantly improves the accuracy of parameter estimation. ### Main Contributions 1. **Improving Parameter Estimation Accuracy**: By adding the gravity - mode period spacing and Gaia luminosity as additional observational constraints, the authors significantly improved the accuracy of estimating the basic parameters of red giants. Specifically, the typical uncertainty of mass is 2.9%, that of age is 11%, that of radius is 1.0%, that of surface gravity is 0.0039 dex, and that of helium core mass is 0.5%. 2. **Recalibrating Seismic Scaling Relations**: Using the improved stellar parameters, the authors recalibrated the seismic scaling relations and studied the surface terms on the red - giant branch. The results show that the surface terms depend on surface gravity and effective temperature, but have no significant correlation with metallicity. 3. **Systematically Studying Surface Terms**: The authors systematically studied the surface terms of red giants and found that as the stars evolve further on the red - giant branch, the surface terms will increase. The surface terms strongly depend on surface gravity and effective temperature, but are independent of metallicity. ### Methods - **Dataset**: An initial sample of 3,642 Kepler red giants was used, from which 1,153 stars with measured radial oscillation mode frequencies, gravity - mode period spacing, and Gaia luminosity were selected. - **Modeling Method**: A grid of stellar models calculated by LI22 was adopted, and more models were added to improve the mass resolution. Parameter estimation was carried out by combining effective temperature, metallicity, and luminosity as non - seismic observational constraints, and radial mode frequencies and gravity - mode period spacing as seismic observational constraints. ### Results - **Improvement in Parameter Accuracy**: Compared with the previous LI22 study, the new method significantly improves the accuracy of parameter estimation. - **Systematic Offset Analysis**: By comparing the new and old results, systematic offsets were found, especially an average offset of 4.4% in mass estimation. - **Recalibration of Seismic Scaling Relations**: The updated νmax scaling relation shows that the influence of effective temperature and metallicity is small and is closer to the standard seismic scaling relation. ### Conclusions By introducing the gravity - mode period spacing and Gaia luminosity as additional observational constraints, the authors significantly improved the accuracy of estimating the basic parameters of 1,153 Kepler red giants. This makes this sample one of the most precisely characterized large - scale red - giant samples at present. In addition, the study also recalibrated the seismic scaling relations and systematically studied the surface terms of red giants, revealing the law of the surface terms with the evolution of stars.

Asteroseismic Modeling of 1,153 Kepler Red Giant Branch Stars: Improved Stellar Parameters with Gravity-Mode Period Spacings and Luminosity Constraints

Asteroseismology of red giants from the first four months of Kepler data: Fundamental parameters

Revisiting the Red-giant Branch Hosts KOI-3886 and $ι$ Draconis. Detailed Asteroseismic Modeling and Consolidated Stellar Parameters

Seismic and spectroscopic analysis of 9 bright red giants observed by Kepler

Red horizontal branch stars: An asteroseismic perspective

Asteroseismology of 36 Kepler subgiants -- II: Determining ages from detailed modelling

The highest mass Kepler red giants – I. Global asteroseismic parameters of 48 stars

Mass and Age of Red Giant Branch Stars Observed with LAMOST and \emph{Kepler}

Asteroseismic measurement of core and envelope rotation rates for 2006 red giant branch stars

TESS Asteroseismic Masses and Radii of Red Giants with (and without) Planets

Gravity modes as a way to distinguish between hydrogen- and helium-burning red giant stars

Determining the Age for the Red Giants KIC 9145955 and KIC 9970396 by Gravity-dominated Mixed Modes

Investigating Gaia EDR3 parallax systematics using asteroseismology of Cool Giant Stars observed by Kepler, K2, and TESS I. Asteroseismic distances to 12,500 red-giant stars

Red giants evolutionary status determination: the complete Kepler catalog

Fundamental properties of five Kepler stars using global asteroseismic quantities and ground-based observations

A seismic scaling relation for stellar age II: The red giant branch

Realistic Uncertainties for Fundamental Properties of Asteroseismic Red Giants and the Interplay between Mixing Length, Metallicity, and ν max

Characterization of the power excess of solar-like oscillations in red giants with Kepler

The effect of the adiabatic assumption on asteroseismic scaling relations for luminous red giants