GroupDebate: Enhancing the Efficiency of Multi-Agent Debate Using Group Discussion

Tongxuan Liu,Xingyu Wang,Weizhe Huang,Wenjiang Xu,Yuting Zeng,Lei Jiang,Hailong Yang,Jing Li
2024-09-21
Abstract:In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse NLP tasks. Extensive research has explored how to enhance the logical reasoning abilities such as Chain-of-Thought, Chain-of-Thought with Self-Consistency, Tree-Of-Thoughts, and multi-agent debates. In the context of multi-agent debates, significant performance improvements can be achieved with an increasing number of agents and debate rounds. However, the escalation in the number of agents and debate rounds can drastically raise the tokens cost of debates, thereby limiting the scalability of the multi-agent debate technique. To better harness the advantages of multi-agent debates in logical reasoning tasks, this paper proposes a method to significantly reduce token cost in multi-agent debates. This approach involves dividing all agents into multiple debate groups, with agents engaging in debates within their respective groups and sharing interim debate results between groups. Comparative experiments across multiple datasets have demonstrated that this method can reduce the total tokens by up to 51.7% during debates and while potentially enhancing accuracy by as much as 25%. Our method significantly enhances the performance and efficiency of interactions in the multi-agent debate.
Computation and Language,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of the sharp increase in token costs as the number of agents and debate rounds increase in multi-agent debate. Although multi-agent debate has shown significant effectiveness in improving the performance of logical reasoning tasks, the excessively high token costs limit its scalability and widespread application, especially in scenarios with limited computational resources. To overcome this challenge, the authors propose a group discussion-based approach called GroupDebate (GD). By dividing all agents into multiple debate groups and conducting debates within the groups, then aggregating the debate results and sharing them among the groups, this method significantly reduces token costs while maintaining or even improving accuracy. Specifically, the main contributions of GroupDebate include: 1. Proposing an innovative multi-agent debate strategy that improves the efficiency and performance of multi-agent debates through group discussions. 2. Conducting a theoretical analysis of token costs, demonstrating the effectiveness and efficiency of the method. 3. Conducting extensive experiments on 4 logical reasoning and mathematical datasets, showing that the method not only significantly reduces token costs but may also improve accuracy, validating the efficiency and superiority of the method.