Abstract:Mendelian randomization is the use of genetic variants to make causal inferences from observational data. The field is currently undergoing a revolution fuelled by increasing numbers of genetic variants demonstrated to be associated with exposures in genome-wide association studies, and the public availability of summarized data on genetic associations with exposures and outcomes from large consortia. A Mendelian randomization analysis with many genetic variants can be performed relatively simply using summarized data. However, a causal interpretation is only assured if each genetic variant satisfies the assumptions of an instrumental variable. To provide some protection against failure of these assumptions, robust methods for instrumental variable analysis have been proposed. Here, we develop three extensions to instrumental variable methods using: i) robust regression, ii) the penalization of weights from candidate instruments with heterogeneous causal estimates, and iii) L1 penalization. Results from a wide variety of robust methods, including the recently-proposed MR-Egger and median-based methods, are compared in an extensive simulation study. We demonstrate that two methods, robust regression in an inverse-variance weighted method and a simple median of the causal estimates from the individual variants, have considerably improved Type 1 error rates compared with conventional methods in a wide variety of scenarios when up to 30% of the genetic variants are invalid instruments. While the MR-Egger method gives unbiased estimates when its assumptions are satisfied, these estimates are less efficient than those from other methods and are highly sensitive to violations of the assumptions. Methods that make different assumptions should be used routinely to assess the robustness of findings from applied Mendelian randomization investigations with multiple genetic variants.

Non-parametric Replication of Instrumental Variable Estimates Across Studies

Instrumental variable analysis in the presence of unmeasured confounding

LASSO-type instrumental variable selection methods with an application to Mendelian randomization

Doubly Robust Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects Using Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjustment

Nested Instrumental Variables Design: Switcher Average Treatment Effect, Identification, Efficient Estimation and Generalizability

Improving Inference from Simple Instruments through Compliance Estimation

Selective Machine Learning of the Average Treatment Effect with an Invalid Instrumental Variable

Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments and its Application to Mendelian Randomization

Bayesian variable selection in linear regression models with instrumental variables

The covariate-adjusted residual estimator and its use in both randomized trials and observational settings

Bridging preference-based instrumental variable studies and cluster-randomized encouragement experiments: Study design, noncompliance, and average cluster effect ratio

Nonparametric Jackknife Instrumental Variable Estimation and Confounding Robust Surrogate Indices

Bounded, efficient and multiply robust estimation of average treatment effects using instrumental variables

Addressing unmeasured confounders in cohort studies: Instrumental variable method for a time‐fixed exposure on an outcome trajectory

Identifying Dynamic LATEs with a Static Instrument

Estimation and inference for high-dimensional nonparametric additive instrumental-variables regression

Mendelian Randomization when Many Instruments are Invalid: Hierarchical Empirical Bayes Estimation

Robust instrumental variable methods using multiple candidate instruments with application to Mendelian randomization

Instrumental Variable Model Average With Applications in Nonlinear Causal Inference

Learning the Covariance of Treatment Effects Across Many Weak Experiments

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects by Combining Weak Instruments and Observational Data